Sara Duterte urged to personally explain 'assassin' threat at impeachment trial
Technology
2026年6月30日
4
Philstar Nation

Sara Duterte urged to personally explain 'assassin' threat at impeachment trial

AI サマリー

House impeachment prosecutors are urging Vice President Sara Duterte to personally testify at her impeachment trial regarding her remarks suggesting the assassination of the president. They emphasize that her appearance would make her claims more convincing.

MANILA, Philippines — Vice President Sara Duterte would help her own case by personally showing up to her trial to explain her November 2024 remarks of contracting an assassin to kill the president, House impeachment prosecutors said Monday, June 29. "The court, I think, would benefit from hearing her explain personally why she said those things that we all saw," said Rep. Chel Diokno (Akbayan), one of 11 House prosecutors who will join the trial when the Senate impeachment court opens the proceedings next week. Lawyer Reynaldo Robles of the law firm Chan Robles & Associates noted that Duterte's team has signaled it will argue her remarks were protected speech, a claim, he said, she should make under oath, not through her lawyers. Robles is one of four lawyers who were introduced as the new private prosecutors joining the House prosecution panel on Monday. "This issue was brought up in a video that she herself said. Our countrymen saw that the threats were made by her," Robles told reporters. "Since the defense she is invoking — that this is freedom of expression — is personal to her, it would be more convincing if it can be heard from her own mouth." Robles said Duterte's appearance would allow the prosecution to cross-examine her "on if and under what circumstances she said those things." Duterte is not required to show up at her own trial. Senate Resolution 39, or the 2011 Rules of Procedure on Impeachment Trials, states that if the impeached official fails to appear in person or through counsel, a "not guilty" plea is entered on her behalf and the proceedings continue without her. The Senate has confirmed those rules will govern the trial. Her defense has stopped short of committing to her appearance. Lawyer Michael Poa, one of Duterte's lawyers and the spokesperson of her defense team, has said the vice president would show up "if needed" and is open to testifying. Lead House prosecutor Rep. Gerville Luistro (Batangas, 2nd District) has warned Duterte that snubbing the trial would be "disadvantageous" as it would leave the evidence unrebutted. Trial timeline. The trial proper begins on July 6 at the Senate, running Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday afternoons from 2 p.m. onward. The pre-trial conference wrapped up last week, with the impeachment court expected to release its pre-trial order — a comprehensive list of agreed facts, witnesses and exhibits — before opening day. House prosecutors have asked for 62 trial dates to present their case; the defense has sought at least 30. Both sides now concede the trial will likely run past September. A guilty verdict would remove Duterte from office and bar her for life from public position.

多角的分析

経済的影響

副大統領の弾劾裁判は、フィリピン経済に直接的な影響を与えるものではないが、政治的安定性への懸念を高め、外国からの投資判断に間接的な影響を与える可能性がある。特に、政治的リスクを重視する投資家は、このような不確実性を回避する傾向がある。

投資家心理

投資家にとって、副大統領の弾劾裁判は、フィリピンの政治的リスクを評価する上で重要な指標となる。彼女の出廷や証言の内容は、政権の安定性や将来の政策決定への影響を示唆する可能性があり、慎重な観察が必要となる。

社会的影響

副大統領の発言が公の場で議論されることは、国民の政治への関心を高める一方で、社会的な分断を深める可能性もある。特に、彼女の支持者と反対派の間での感情的な対立が激化する懸念がある。また、裁判の長期化は、国民の政治への疲弊感も招きかねない。

市民の声

マニラ首都圏の市民にとって、副大統領の弾劾裁判は、政治の混乱を実感させる出来事となる。裁判の進捗や結果によっては、生活への直接的な影響はないとしても、政治への信頼感や将来への不安が増大する可能性がある。特に、交通渋滞や物価上昇といった日常的な問題が、政治的混乱によってさらに悪化しないかという懸念も生じうる。

背景・歴史的文脈

フィリピンにおける弾劾裁判は、過去にも大統領や最高裁判所長官が対象となった例がある。2018年には、マリア・ルイーザ・モレノ最高裁判所長官が弾劾により罷免された。今回の副大統領に対する弾劾は、現職の副大統領としては異例の事態であり、その発言内容が国家元首に対する脅迫と解釈されるかどうかが争点となる。これは、フィリピンの政治における権力闘争と、言論の自由の範囲を巡る議論を反映している。

原文ソース

Philstar Nation

原文を読む