
Graft case vs. ex-congressman Co archived
A graft case against former congressman Elizaldy Co has been archived by the Sandiganbayan due to his continued absence, as he remains at large six months after an arrest warrant was issued. The court will resume proceedings once he is apprehended.
The Sandiganbayan has ordered the archiving of a graft case filed against Elizaldy “Zaldy” Co, the former congressman at the center of the public works corruption scandal, as he has remained at large six months since the court ordered his arrest. The order issued by the court’s Seventh Division was cited in the minutes of its proceedings on June 24. The document was released to reporters on Thursday. In November 2025, after Co was charged with one count of malversation and two counts of graft in the Sandiganbayan, the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) ordered the police to enforce the arrest warrants against him and 15 other people facing graft and malversation charges tied to a substandard P289.5-million road dike project in Oriental Mindoro province. The warrant has yet to be served on Co, the former chair of the House appropriations committee in the 19th Congress, who left the country in July 2025 purportedly for a medical checkup. In its recent proceedings, the court said: “In view thereof and considering that the Court has yet to acquire jurisdiction over the person of accused Co, let this case be ARCHIVED and the record thereof be forwarded to Judgment and Records Section, without prejudice to the reinstatement or revival of the case and its withdrawal from the archives upon the such time as the Court acquires jurisdiction over his person.” Archiving will pause proceedings until Co, already declared a fugitive by the court, is arrested. The division also cited the “return on the warrant” submitted by Rehom Pimentel, the National Bureau of Investigation’s agent-on-case, stating that “despite efforts undertaken, the accused could not be located at the address indicated in the Warrant of Arrest.” Authorities first tried to look for Co at his Taguig City condominium but found the unit locked. The prosecution later manifested that it had no additional details to provide the court on Co’s residential address, other than those already stated in the records. Speaker Faustino Dy III revoked Co’s travel clearance on Sept. 18, 2025, asking him to come home within 10 days to answer allegations linking him to questionable budget insertions and contractors doing public works projects. But instead of coming home, Co resigned as Ako Bicol party list representative on Sept. 29. He released video messages in November 2025 claiming the involvement of other government officials to questionable budget insertions and alleged kickbacks involving flood control funds. The following month, his Philippine passport was canceled as the government pursued leads on his whereabouts. In April this year, President Marcos announced that Co had been detained in the Czech Republic after supposedly trying to cross the border into Germany with invalid travel documents. However, Czech authorities released Co after 72 hours. The last statements from Malacañang about Co were about his pending application for political asylum in France, wherein the former lawmaker claimed being under “political persecution” by the Marcos administration. —WITH A REPORT FROM INQUIRER RESEARCH INQ
多角的分析
元議員コ氏の事件凍結は、公的資金の使途に対する監視体制の弱さと、法の執行における遅延を示唆している。これは、フィリピンにおけるインフラ投資の透明性への懸念を高め、国内および海外からの投資家心理に悪影響を与える可能性がある。過去にも同様の汚職疑惑がインフラプロジェクトの遅延やコスト増を招いた事例があり、これが繰り返されると、経済成長の足かせとなる。
コ氏の事件凍結は、フィリピンの司法制度の有効性に対する投資家の信頼を損なう可能性がある。特に、公的事業における汚職は、プロジェクトの遅延、コスト超過、そして最終的な収益性の低下につながるリスクを高める。投資家は、このような不確実性を回避するため、より透明性の高い市場への投資を優先する傾向がある。
コ氏の件は、公的資金の不正流用に対する国民の不信感を増幅させる。特に、地方のインフラプロジェクトは、地域住民の生活向上に直結するため、その質や適切性への関心は高い。コ氏が国外で政治的庇護を申請しているという事実は、国内の司法プロセスへの不信感や、権力者による法の回避といった懸念を抱かせる。
コ氏の訴訟凍結は、地方のインフラプロジェクトにおける汚職の疑いに対する国民の怒りを再燃させる可能性がある。オリエンタル・ミンドロ州の住民は、不十分な道路護岸プロジェクトによって直接的な被害を受けている可能性があり、法の正義が果たされないことへの不満は大きい。さらに、コ氏が国外で政治的庇護を求めているという事実は、国民の間に「権力者は法を逃れられる」という諦めや不信感を生じさせる。
背景・歴史的文脈
フィリピンでは、公的事業における汚職は長年の課題である。特に、インフラプロジェクトは巨額の予算が動くため、不正の温床となりやすい。過去にも、多くの政治家や官僚が汚職で告発されているが、裁判の長期化や証拠不十分、あるいは被告人の逃亡により、有罪判決に至らないケースも少なくない。コ氏の事件は、こうした構造的な問題が依然として根強く存在することを示唆している。
原文ソース
Inquirer NewsInfo