
Sara Duterte's threats predated Zuleika Lopez's detention – House prosecutors
House prosecutors in the Philippines argue that Vice President Sara Duterte's alleged threats against President Marcos and others were planned before, not triggered by, her chief of staff's detention, citing NBI testimony.
MANILA, Philippines — House prosecutors are arguing that Vice President Sara Duterte's alleged threat against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and other officials was not triggered by the detention of her chief of staff, Zuleika Lopez, but only disclosed during it. Benjamin "Jay" Tolosa Jr., a private prosecutor and legal spokesperson for the House prosecution panel, said National Bureau of Investigation Regional Director Jeremy Lotoc's testimony established that Duterte had allegedly spoken to someone about carrying out the threat even before Lopez was detained at the House of Representatives. "As pointed out by Lotoc, the agreement was made even before the detention. She just announced to the world that there was an agreement during that detention," Tolosa told ANC's "Headstart" on Wednesday, July 15. Lopez, along with House of Representatives security official Belinda Bello, was supposed to testify before the Senate impeachment court this week. Both were later dropped as witnesses by House prosecutors to avoid redundancy. "We determined that the intended testimonies of Zuleika Lopez as well as Capt. Bello were no longer necessary because they were already covered essentially by the first two witnesses," Tolosa said. Lopez was detained at the House after she was cited in contempt on Nov. 20, 2024, for "undue interference" in the House Blue Ribbon Committee into Duterte's alleged misuse of confidential funds. The contempt citation stemmed from a letter Lopez signed and sent through the Office of the Vice President to the Commission on Audit, asking it to disregard a subpoena for audit reports on the OVP's confidential expenses in 2022 and 2023. Duterte accompanied Lopez in detention and stayed in the office of her brother, Davao City 1st District Rep. Paolo Duterte. In a livestreamed online press conference on Nov. 23, 2024, Duterte made the assassination remarks against Marcos, first lady Liza Araneta-Marcos and former House speaker Martin Romualdez. Duterte's defense lawyers previously argued before the Senate impeachment court that the remarks were made as a "response" to the situation involving Lopez. Tolosa said Lotoc made it clear, based on the NBI's investigation, that an alleged assassination plot was already in existence before Lopez was detained. "Ang pinakamahalaga na banggit ni Lotoc about this matter is he stated that it was clear that the agreement with the assassin to kill the President, the First Lady and then Speaker of the House was made even prior to the detention," Tolosa said. (The most important thing Lotoc mentioned about this matter is that he stated it was clear that the agreement with the assassin to kill the President, the First Lady and the then Speaker of the House was made even before the detention.) Sixth trial day. Duterte's impeachment trial entered its sixth day Wednesday, July 15, with no witnesses expected to be presented. The vice president faces four articles of impeachment, including allegations of betrayal of public trust, misuse of confidential funds, bribery, and graft and corruption. A conviction on any one article would be enough to remove Duterte from office if supported by at least two-thirds of all members of the Senate impeachment court.
多角的分析
本件は直接的な経済的影響は少ないが、政治的不安定性が高まることで、国内投資や外国直接投資(FDI)に対するセンチメントが悪化する可能性がある。特に、副大統領という要職にある人物の関与は、政策決定の不確実性を増大させ、経済政策の実行に遅延や混乱をもたらすリスクがある。
投資家は、政治的リスクの増大を警戒するだろう。特に、副大統領が関与する弾劾裁判は、フィリピンの政治的安定性に対する懸念を高め、株式市場や債券市場にネガティブな影響を与える可能性がある。短期的な市場のボラティリティ上昇が予想される。
副大統領の側近が拘束され、さらに副大統領自身が暗殺計画に関与したとの疑惑が浮上したことは、国民の政治不信を一層深める可能性がある。特に、法の執行や政治家の説明責任に対する国民の目は厳しくなるだろう。また、このような政治的混乱は、日常生活における不安感を増大させる要因となりうる。
市民、特に副大統領の支持者にとっては、この疑惑は衝撃的であり、自身の政治的選択への疑問を抱かせる可能性がある。一方で、政治的混乱や権力闘争を懸念する市民は、早期の事態収拾と説明責任の追及を求めるだろう。ロペス氏の拘束は、彼女の家族や関係者にも直接的な影響を与えている。
背景・歴史的文脈
フィリピンでは、権力闘争や政治的対立が弾劾裁判に発展する歴史が繰り返されてきた。特に、副大統領職は、大統領とは異なる選挙で選ばれるため、しばしば政権内で緊張関係が生じやすい。2024年11月の出来事は、ドゥテルテ前大統領の政治的影響力と、現マルコス政権との関係性、そして副大統領の機密資金使用疑惑といった、複合的な政治的背景が絡み合っている。
原文ソース
Philstar Nation