
Tibet's Role in China's Green Energy Supply Chain and Resource Development
China leads the world in renewables, developing large-scale green infrastructure in Tibet. However, these projects, including mining and dams, proceed without Tibetan consent, causing environmental damage, cultural disruption, and displacement, raising questions about resource exploitation.
Amid the global shift to renewable energy, China leads the world in manufacturing and processing capacity. It is building major green infrastructure in Tibet, including large solar projects and the planned Metok (Motuo) mega-dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo. Many batteries used in clean technologies also depend on materials produced in the region. Tibet therefore stands at the forefront of China’s green energy development across wind, solar, and hydropower. Recently, a newly identified chromite deposit was discovered in the Dongqiao region near Amdo Town in Amdo County, Nagchu Prefecture, adding over 1.1 million tons of associated chromite ore resources. The Luobusha mining area in Chusum County, Lhokha Prefecture, holds another 738,300 metric tons of chromite resources. China has also identified a new source of high purity quartz in Tingkye County, Shigatse City, aiming to reduce reliance on imports of this critical material used in solar panels and semiconductors, according to the South China Morning Post on June 8. These developments reflect China’s accelerating exploration of strategic minerals in Tibet. Critical minerals, which are increasingly becoming strategic resources, are abundant in Tibet. Tibet plays an important role in China’s copper supply chain and generates significant economic benefits. Some of the largest mines under Chinese control are located there, including the Yulong Copper Mine, which contains copper, molybdenum, iron, and gold. In 2024, Yulong’s copper production was approximately 159,100 metric tons. From January to September 2025, it produced 125,000 metric tons of copper. Its industrial output value reached 11.6 billion yuan in 2025, making it the first enterprise in Chamdo and the second in the Tibet Autonomous Region to exceed 10 billion yuan in output value. The Julong copper mine in Tibet offers a similar example. Once its third phase is completed, it is projected to produce 350,000 tons annually, making it the largest standalone copper mine in China. Together, these developments show how rapidly the scale and pace of mining in Tibet have expanded in recent years. China has also expanded mining in high-altitude areas that were previously difficult to access. One example is Zijin’s mining project, which has been made possible by technological advances at an elevation of around 5,000 meters above sea level. However, operating at such extreme elevation could cause serious environmental damage. While Chinese companies clearly profit from mineral extraction, an important question remains: where do these profits go? China presents itself as a green energy powerhouse, a portrayal that has received global appreciation. But some of its landmark renewable energy projects are damaging the environment and local livelihoods – especially in Tibet. The Khamtok Dege Dam, known in Chinese as Gangtuo, is located on the Drichu, the upper Yangtze River, and has already raised serious environmental and social concerns. Once completed, the dam is expected to submerge six monasteries and displace at least 4,287 residents. Among the monasteries at risk is the Wontoe Monastery, built in the eighth century and known for its 14th-century Buddhist murals. In addition to China’s hydropower expansion, the installation of solar panels across Tibet has accelerated sharply. According to a study by Dr. Nityananda, Tibet’s unique geography gives it strong potential for solar farms and other renewable energy projects. His mapping and analysis showed that solar panels are expanding rapidly across Tibet. This growth, however, appears to be driven not only by clean technology goals but also by a broader policy agenda. The expansion of solar farms is presented as beneficial for Tibet’s ecology. However, Sangay Tashi’s research suggests that it is difficult to definitively assess whether such projects are truly helpful. Instead, deep uncertainty remains about how this widespread construction of solar farms may disrupt traditional cultural practices and ways of life in the future. Despite these concerns, China has reacted by cracking down on those who raise concerns about Tibet’s ecological, cultural, and social landscape. According to Save Tibet, Chinese authorities arrested more than 1,000 Tibetans during protests against the Khamtok Dege Dam. Separately, Tsongon Tsering was reportedly suppressed for speaking out against illegal Chinese mining practices in Tibet. Soon after, mass arrests and a communication blackout occurred in Kham Zachuka following the discovery of gold deposits at Serkhok. China has evidently failed to follow the principles outlined in Critical Energy Transition Minerals, a 2025 document prepared by the U.N. Secretary-General’s Working Group on Transforming the Extractive Industries for Sustainable Development. The guidance emphasizes seven key principles for responsible resource extraction, including human rights, environmental protection, equity, and justice. In Tibet, these core principles are not being upheld. This year, China released a new mining regulation, scheduled to take effect on July 15. According to Xinhua, China’s state news agency, the law “aim[s] at strengthening the conservation of mineral resources and ecological environment, advancing the high-quality development of the mining sector, and safeguarding mineral resource security.” Yet China has a poor track record of upholding legislation relating to the rights of its citizens over its companies. The value of the law remains questionable if the government does not enforce it in practice. As China builds some of the world’s largest solar, hydropower, and wind projects, Tibet is at the epicenter. Mineral exploration and extraction in Tibet are also intensifying, again to fuel the green energy industry. As China’s energy demand continues to rise, Tibet has the potential to play a significant role in China’s green energy supply chain. These developments pose serious environmental risks and carry significant social and geopolitical implications. Although China presents its green energy expansion as an environmental initiative, unsustainable mining and rapid hydropower development in Tibet are turning the region into a resource hub for China’s energy transition. If green energy is genuinely intended to support environmental protection, China should follow the guidelines issued by the United Nations. Tibetan communities should be meaningfully consulted on these projects, and their voices taken seriously. Source: The Diplomat Indonesia
多角的分析
中国のグリーンエネルギー戦略におけるチベットの資源開発は、国内のエネルギー需要を満たす上で経済的に不可欠な役割を担っている。特に、銅や高純度石英といった戦略的鉱物の供給源としての重要性は増している。ユロン銅山やジュロン銅山の生産実績は、地域経済に数十億元規模の貢献をしており、中国の鉱業セクターの成長を牽引している。しかし、これらの開発がもたらす環境コストや、地域経済への真の還元が不明確である点は、持続可能な経済発展の観点から課題である。
中国のグリーンエネルギー分野への投資は、世界的に見ても大きな注目を集めている。チベットにおける鉱物資源開発は、そのサプライチェーンの根幹をなすものであり、関連企業にとっては安定した原料供給源となり得る。しかし、開発に伴う環境規制の強化や、人権・文化遺産保護に関する国際的な懸念の高まりは、ESG投資の観点からリスク要因となり得る。投資家は、これらのリスクを慎重に評価し、透明性の高い企業やプロジェクトへの投資を検討する必要がある。
チベットにおけるグリーンエネルギー開発は、地域住民の生活や文化に深刻な影響を与えている。ダム建設による強制移住や、歴史的価値のある寺院の破壊は、チベットの人々のアイデンティティと生活基盤を脅かしている。また、資源開発の利益が地域住民に還元されず、中国政府や国営企業に集中しているとの指摘は、社会的な不平等を拡大させる可能性がある。住民の声が開発プロセスに反映されない現状は、地域社会の持続可能性を損なう。
チベットの市民にとって、グリーンエネルギー開発は、生活環境の激変と文化の喪失を意味している。ダム建設予定地周辺の住民は、住み慣れた土地からの強制移住を強いられる不安に直面している。また、伝統的な生活様式や宗教儀式が、広大な太陽光パネルの設置によって影響を受ける可能性もある。開発の恩恵が一部に偏り、自分たちの生活が犠牲になることへの不満や、声を上げることへの恐怖が、市民の間に広がっていると考えられる。
背景・歴史的文脈
中国によるチベットの資源開発は、1950年代以降の併合以来、中央政府がチベットの経済的・戦略的価値を重視してきた歴史的背景を持つ。特に、近年、世界的なグリーンエネルギーへの移行が進む中で、チベットが持つ豊富な鉱物資源と再生可能エネルギーのポテンシャルが注目されるようになった。2010年代以降、大規模なインフラ投資が進み、鉱山開発や水力発電所の建設が加速したが、これらはチベットの伝統的な生活様式や宗教文化、そして脆弱な生態系に深刻な影響を与えている。国連の持続可能な開発目標(SDGs)や人権原則との乖離が指摘される中、中国政府は資源開発を国家戦略として推進し続けている。
原文ソース
The Diplomat Indonesia