
General articles are free for 24 hours after publish.
VP Duterte's Self-Incrimination Claim May Not Shield Husband
The constitutional protection against self-incrimination, invoked by Vice President Sara Duterte to refuse attendance at her Senate impeachment trial, may not necessarily allow her husband, lawyer Manases “Mans” Carpio, to adopt the same stance if prosecutors subpoena him regarding financial records in her unexplained wealth case.
The constitutional protection against self-incrimination, which Vice President Sara Duterte has been invoking for refusing to attend her Senate impeachment trial, will not necessarily allow her husband, lawyer Manases “Mans” Carpio, to take the same position if prosecutors call him to explain financial records relevant to her unexplained wealth case. The Vice President has cited Article III, Section 17 of the Constitution, which states that no person shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. However, legal experts suggest that while this right is personal to the individual, it may not automatically shield a spouse or a third party from testifying on matters where their direct involvement or knowledge is being questioned. In Carpio's case, the extent of his knowledge or involvement in the Vice President's financial dealings would be crucial. If prosecutors can present evidence suggesting his direct participation in the accumulation or management of her wealth, his ability to invoke self-incrimination may be limited. This issue touches upon the principles of accountability and the scope of constitutional rights within the Philippine political landscape.
Original source
Inquirer NewsInfo