Senate ex-sergeant-at-arms dismissed over May shooting incident
Security
2026年7月5日
4
Inquirer NewsInfo

Senate ex-sergeant-at-arms dismissed over May shooting incident

AI サマリー

The Philippine Ombudsman has dismissed the former Senate sergeant-at-arms over his alleged involvement in a shooting incident within the Senate premises in May, amidst a chaotic situation involving an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant.

The Philippine Ombudsman has dismissed from service the former acting Senate sergeant-at-arms, Mao Ranada Aplasca, over his alleged involvement in a shooting incident that occurred within the Senate premises on May 13. Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla announced on Saturday that the dismissal order against Aplasca, a former police general, was issued on June 29. Aplasca was removed from his posts as sergeant-at-arms of the Senate and the Commission on Appointments. Remulla declined to provide further details, stating that the decision would be released publicly "for people to see." The May 13 shooting incident took place during a turbulent week at the Senate, which began with the unannounced appearance of Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa. Dela Rosa had been evading an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC) for crimes against humanity as a co-perpetrator of President Rodrigo Duterte. Dela Rosa had been in hiding since November 2025 to evade the warrant. He managed to reach the session hall, creating a crucial shift in the Senate majority, which led to the election of Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano as Senate president, ousting Sen. Vicente “Tito” Sotto III. After Cayetano publicly castigated then Sergeant-at-Arms Edgardo Rene Samonte for the near-arrest of Dela Rosa, Samonte promptly resigned. Dela Rosa then nominated Aplasca, one of his classmates at the Philippine Military Academy (PMA), to replace Samonte, and the senators approved Aplasca’s appointment as acting head of the OSAA. During the Senate session, Marcoleta moved to put Dela Rosa under the "protective custody" of the Senate to prevent him from being taken by the NBI. On May 13, gunshots rang out in a corridor on the second floor of the Senate building that leads to a passage to the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS). The loud shots sent journalists and Senate staff running in panic. No one suffered any gunshot injuries. Hours later, Dela Rosa was seen on a Senate CCTV video boarding a car with Sen. Robinhood Padilla. The vehicle left the Senate, and Dela Rosa again went into hiding. On May 20, the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) of the Philippine National Police recommended the filing of complaints against Aplasca and two OSAA security personnel for firing their weapons "without provocation" in violation of Republic Act No. 11917, or the Private Security Services Industry Act. CIDG Director Police Maj. Gen. Robert Morico II said Aplasca did not follow protocol and disregarded legal requirements for the justified use of firearms, as the acting OSAA chief and his team encountered "no unlawful aggression" that night. Before the shooting broke out, Aplasca verbally asked one of the NBI agents he encountered to identify himself, according to a report sent by Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla to Cayetano. After the agent identified himself as "NBI," Aplasca allegedly saw the agent raising a "long firearm," prompting the OSAA chief to fire a "warning shot," the report added. According to Morico, the NBI agent fired at least five shots as he stepped back—all directed away from Aplasca. The agent then met his companion and they regrouped with the rest of their team, the CIDG chief said. Aplasca disputed the accuracy of CCTV videos presented by the Department of the Interior and Local Government and the Philippine National Police purportedly showing him firing shots at the NBI agent, claiming it was "spliced" to "support their narrative." Morico said that 39 of the 44 spent shells recovered at the scene came from only three guns, all issued to the OSAA team. He described the action taken by the OSAA personnel in the May 13 incident as "overkill." Addressing a rally by thousands of Iglesia ni Cristo members protesting against Marcoleta’s imminent arrest on June 30, Padilla referred to the CCTV video as he defended himself from allegations that he helped Dela Rosa to escape. "Does Bato look like he escaped?" he said, speaking in Filipino. "Incredible! We were just walking, we rode a car, we went out. There were thousands of police, no one stopped to arrest us. How is that an escape?" —WITH A REPORT FROM INQUIRER RESEARCH

多角的分析

経済的影響

今回の監察官室による元上院警備責任者の解任は、直接的な経済的影響は限定的であると考えられる。しかし、政治的安定性の低下は、国内外からの投資家心理に間接的な悪影響を与えうる。特に、フィリピンの政治情勢は、BPO産業や海外からの直接投資(FDI)の動向に影響を与えやすいため、今後の政治的展開が注視される。

投資家心理

投資家にとっては、今回の解任は、フィリピンにおける法執行機関の独立性と政治的介入の可能性に対する懸念を再認識させる出来事となる。過去にも、政治的混乱が市場のボラティリティを高めた事例があり、投資家は政治リスクを慎重に評価する必要がある。特に、デラ・ローザ上院議員への逮捕状発行とそれに続く議会内の騒動は、法の執行と政治権力の力学に関する複雑な問題を示唆しており、投資判断において考慮されるべき要素である。

社会的影響

この事件は、フィリピン国民、特に首都圏のマニラやその周辺に住む人々にとって、治安と法秩序に対する不安を増大させる可能性がある。連邦議会という国の中心で銃撃事件が発生したことは、市民の安全への懸念を刺激する。また、デラ・ローザ議員がICCの捜査対象となっている事実は、国際的な法規範と国内政治との間の緊張関係を示しており、市民は自国の法制度と国際社会からの監視との関係について、より深く考える機会を得ている。

市民の声

今回の事件は、連邦議会という国の中心で起きた銃撃事件であり、市民、特にマニラ首都圏の住民にとって、治安と法秩序に対する不安を増大させる。デラ・ローザ議員がICCの捜査対象となっている事実は、国際的な法規範と国内政治との間の緊張関係を示しており、市民は自国の法制度と国際社会からの監視との関係について、より深く考える機会を得ている。

背景・歴史的文脈

フィリピンの政治は、しばしば権力闘争や派閥間の対立が激しく、法執行機関や司法機関が政治的圧力にさらされることがある。2016年に発足したドゥテルテ政権下では、国際刑事裁判所(ICC)による麻薬戦争への捜査が開始され、ロナルド・デラ・ローザ上院議員らがその対象となった。デラ・ローザ議員は、ドゥテルテ前大統領の側近であり、2025年11月以降、ICCの逮捕状を逃れるために潜伏していた。今回の上院での混乱は、ICCによる捜査とフィリピン国内の政治的力学が複雑に絡み合った結果として発生した。元上院警備責任者の解任は、この一連の出来事における政治的責任の所在を問う動きの一環である。

原文ソース

Inquirer NewsInfo

原文を読む