Prosecutors 'Very Satisfied' After Second Day of Sara Duterte's Impeachment Trial
The prosecutorial team in the impeachment trial of Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte expressed "very satisfied" with the second day of proceedings. Prosecutors presented evidence related to an alleged "kill threat" made by the Vice President, aiming to maintain momentum. The defense team, however, raised objections regarding the veracity of evidence and the context of video clips.
This article requires PRO
This article is outside the free access window or is a special report. PRO unlocks it and the full archive.
Related articles
- VP Duterte: NBI tried to 'forcibly' bring ex-Davao info officer to Manila
Vice President Sara Duterte criticized the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) for allegedly attempting to 'forcibly' bring former Davao City information officer Jeffrey Tupas to Manila in exchange for money and promises, citing testimony from a former police officer.
- Sara Duterte Asks NBI to Release Gracioso's Lie Detector Test Video
Vice President Sara Duterte urged the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to release the video of dismissed policeman Rodulfo Gracioso Jr.'s lie detector test to quell doubts about its authenticity. She also expressed willingness to undergo a polygraph examination herself.
- Government Urges SC: Junk Petition vs BSKE Postponement Law; Election Lawyer Counters
Philippine government agencies urged the Supreme Court to dismiss a challenge to a law extending the term of barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan officials and postponing elections to 2028. Meanwhile, an election lawyer reiterated his plea for the SC to stop the postponement, arguing it infringes on voters' rights.
- ICC Prosecutor Opposes Evidence Disclosure Cap in Duterte Case
The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor has opposed a request by former president Rodrigo Duterte's lawyers to cap the disclosure of evidence in his crimes against humanity trial related to the "war on drugs." The prosecution argues that the disclosed materials are reasonable given the case's broad scope and the defendant's status as a former head of state, and are essential for fulfilling disclosure obligations.