Marcos Jr. wants Congress to stop consumers from paying for 'system loss' in electricity bills
Technology
2026年7月28日
5
Rappler Business

General articles are free for 24 hours after publish.

Marcos Jr. wants Congress to stop consumers from paying for 'system loss' in electricity bills

Share
AI Summary

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has questioned why consumers bear the cost of 'system loss' in electricity bills, urging Congress to amend the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA). His stance is that households should not be charged for electricity they do not receive.

MANILA, Philippines – President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. wants Congress to stop electricity distributors from making consumers pay for system losses, arguing in his fifth State of the Nation Address that households should not be charged for electricity that never reaches them. “Hindi naman kasalanan ng consumer kung bakit nagkaroon ng system loss (System loss is not the fault of consumers),” Marcos said to roaring applause, calling for an “immediate amendment” to the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) that would prohibit system loss charges and the value-added tax (VAT) imposed on them. What is system loss? System loss is the difference between the electricity entering a power network and the amount eventually measured and billed to customers. According to Meralco, this charge accounts for electricity lost due to both technical and non-technical factors. Most of it is technical and a consequence of physics. Electric current encounters resistance as it passes through wires, converting part of the energy into heat. Transformers and other equipment also consume or dissipate small amounts of power. There are also non-technical losses, including electricity theft, illegal connections, defective meters, and errors in metering or billing. Unlike losses caused by the physics of transporting electricity, these can be reduced substantially through better meters and improved operations. How much of your Meralco bill is it? Meralco says system loss accounted for about 5% of an average customer’s bill, based on its 2025 bill breakdown. (READ: Why your Meralco bill will be higher in July – and might rise again soon) Meralco says it does not earn from this item. The amount covers the cost of electricity purchased from generation companies and the corresponding transmission charges for power that is lost before reaching consumers. Meralco remits this collection to suppliers of electricity and the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines. So what is the role of a distribution utility company like Meralco? It operates the local wires, poles, transformers, substations, and meters that bring electricity from the transmission grid to customers within its franchise area. It’s also responsible for managing and reducing system losses within that network. Rappler has sought Meralco’s comment. The distribution giant said it would share its statement once available. This story will be updated accordingly. Must Watch How do we fix our broken electricity system? What’s the role of EPIRA? EPIRA authorizes the ERC to determine caps on the system losses that utilities may recover from customers. Any losses beyond that cap must be absorbed by the distribution utility. Section 43 of the law directs the regulator to set those caps based on technical factors such as load density, sales mix, cost of service, and delivery voltage. It also requires rate-setting rules to consider the efficiency or inefficiency of regulated utilities. The cap provides an incentive for utilities to reduce losses because they must shoulder anything above the allowed level. What must Congress change? To carry out Marcos’ proposal, Congress would have to amend the 25-year-old EPIRA to limit the system losses that can be charged. EPIRA was most recently amended in April 2025, but only to extend the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation’s corporate life, which is unrelated. The provision allowing utilities to recover system losses from consumers has remained largely intact since the law was enacted more than two decades ago. The revised law would have to determine whether all system losses — or only, for example, non-technical losses — would be excluded from consumer bills. It must also specify who would absorb the remaining cost. Congress would also have to address Marcos’ separate instruction to prohibit the VAT imposed on system loss charges. What does the DOE say? The Department of Energy (DOE) backed Marcos’ proposal for the immediate amendment of EPIRA, saying consumers should no longer bear system losses that could be reduced through advanced metering, grid upgrades, digital technologies, stronger operations, and measures against electricity theft. “The President’s directive reflects a clear principle: consumers should not continue to bear the burden of avoidable system losses that can be reduced through better infrastructure, modern technologies, stronger operational discipline, and more effective regulation,” read a DOE statement on Monday, July 27. But the DOE also acknowledged the balancing act. It said any EPIRA amendments must protect consumers while preserving a financially sound and reliable electricity industry and encouraging continued infrastructure investment. – Rappler.com

0

Original source

Rappler Business

原文を読む