Imparsial Urges Prabowo to Revoke Presidential Decree on TNI Prosecution Security
Politics
2026年7月16日
5
VOI English

Imparsial Urges Prabowo to Revoke Presidential Decree on TNI Prosecution Security

AI サマリー

Human rights group Imparsial is urging President Prabowo to immediately revoke Presidential Regulation (Perpres) No. 66 of 2025, which involves the TNI in providing security for prosecutors. The organization contends the policy raises constitutional issues, disrupts the criminal justice system, and contradicts the principle of civil supremacy.

JAKARTA - Imparsial urges the President to immediately revoke Presidential Regulation (Perpres) Number 66 of 2025 concerning the security of prosecutors by the TNI. The organization assessed that the policy had raised constitutional issues, disrupted the criminal justice system, and was contrary to the principle of civil supremacy. Imparsial Director, Ardi Manto Adiputra, said the implementation of the Presidential Decree had raised serious issues, especially after the security of the former Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes (Jampidsus) Febrie Adriansyah by TNI soldiers and the presence of TNI members at the Metro Jaya Police which was linked to the alleged corruption case of the former Jampidsus. "The security of the former Jampidsus house by the TNI and the presence of TNI soldiers at the Metro Jaya Police further shows that Presidential Decree Number 66 of 2025 has disrupted the criminal justice system in Indonesia," Ardi said in a statement received, Thursday, July 16, 2026. According to Ardi, since the beginning of Presidential Regulation Number 66 of 2025, the TNI has been disproportionately involved in the function of security for prosecutors. In fact, the involvement of the TNI in assisting civilian institutions can only be carried out in certain circumstances as stipulated in Law Number 34 of 2004 concerning the TNI which has been amended through Law Number 3 of 2025. He emphasized that security for prosecutors is basically the task of the Police. The involvement of the TNI, he said, can only be carried out as a form of assistance in emergency situations, is temporary, and is based on a real threat. "Security for prosecutors is actually the duty and responsibility of the Police. Security by the TNI must not replace or take over the function of the police, but only as a task of assistance," he said. Imparsial also assessed that the presence of TNI soldiers in the security of prosecutors had the potential to create the impression of abuse of authority to protect the apparatus suspected of being involved in criminal acts. According to Ardi, this condition can be qualified as an effort to hinder the process of enforcing the law or obstruction of justice. In addition, Imparsial believes that Presidential Decree Number 66 of 2025 is contrary to the provisions of the TNI Law. In the explanation of Article 47 of Law Number 3 of 2025 it is stated that the placement of active TNI soldiers at the Attorney General's Office only relates to the Attorney General for Military Criminal Affairs (Jampidmil). Therefore, Imparsial urges the President to revoke Presidential Regulation Number 66 of 2025, order the TNI Commander to withdraw all personnel who carry out security for prosecutors, and thoroughly evaluate the policy of involving the TNI in civilian functions. "The President needs to conduct a thorough evaluation of the policy of involving the TNI in civilian functions as a form of responsibility for the current chaos and to prove the government's commitment to maintaining the supremacy of law, civil supremacy, and eradicating corruption in Indonesia," he said.

多角的分析

経済的影響

この大統領令は、検察官の安全保障という文脈でTNIを介入させるものであり、直接的な経済的影響は限定的である。しかし、司法の独立性や法の支配への懸念が高まることは、長期的に見て国内外からの投資環境の悪化を招く可能性がある。司法の混乱は、契約履行の確実性や紛争解決の予測可能性に影響を与え、ビジネスリスクを増大させると考えられる。

投資家心理

投資家にとって、司法の独立性への懸念は重大なリスク要因となる。大統領令が文民優位の原則に反し、司法プロセスを混乱させる可能性が指摘されていることは、法治国家としての信頼性を揺るがす。特に、汚職や不正行為の摘発に関わる検察官へのTNIの介入は、権力乱用の懸念を生じさせ、投資決定において慎重姿勢を促すだろう。

社会的影響

検察官の警護にTNIが関与することは、市民社会の監視機能と法の執行プロセスへの信頼に直接影響を与える。Imparsialのような人権団体が憲法違反や司法妨害の可能性を指摘することは、市民の権利擁護の観点から重要である。元特別犯罪担当検事総長代理の事例は、TNIの介入が権力者保護や捜査妨害につながるのではないかという市民の不安を増幅させる可能性がある。

市民の声

市民の視点からは、この大統領令は法の支配への信頼を損なうものと映る可能性がある。検察官は本来、国民の正義を実現する役割を担うが、その活動が軍の介入によって影響を受けるとなれば、市民は公平な司法へのアクセスが確保されるのか疑問を抱くだろう。特に、過去の汚職事件や権力乱用の事例を考慮すると、TNIの介入は市民の間に不信感や不安を広げる可能性がある。

背景・歴史的文脈

インドネシアでは、スハルト政権崩壊後の民主化プロセスにおいて、軍の政治的・社会的な役割を縮小し、文民統制を強化する動きが進められてきた。検察庁は司法府の一部であり、その独立性は法の支配の根幹をなす。しかし、過去には軍が治安維持や社会秩序維持の名目で文民分野に深く関与した歴史があり、その再発への懸念が常に存在する。2025年大統領令第66号は、この歴史的文脈の中で、検察官の安全保障という名目で、軍の文民分野への介入を公式に認めるものとして、人権団体などから強い批判を受けている。

原文ソース

VOI English

原文を読む