Philippine VP Sara Duterte Denies Impeachment Allegations, Cites Political Persecution

Read The Diplomat, Know The Asia-Pacific The 48-year-old faces charges of corruption, bribery, and an alleged plot to assassinate her rival, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte attends a graduation ceremony at a university in Tabogon, Cebu, Philippines, Jun. 30, 2026. The impeachment trial of Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte began yesterday, after being delayed by legal challenges filed in the court and the squabble over the Senate leadership. After months of refusing to acknowledge the impeachment hearings conducted by the House of Representatives, Duterte finally answered the impeachment allegations against her ahead of the Senate trial. She insisted that the articles of impeachment submitted by the House “suffer from fatal constitutional, procedural, and substantive defects” and hence, should be dismissed. She added that the evidence against her contains “erroneous conclusions, speculation, political rhetoric and materials gathered through an unauthorized evidentiary fishing expedition.” She also criticized the House impeachment proceedings for being “tainted by pre-judgment.” Duterte is accused of betraying public trust by misusing her confidential funds, non-declaration of assets, and plotting to assassinate the First Family. Concerning the charge that she planned to kill President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Duterte claimed that she “merely exercised constitutionally protected speech in opposition to the policies, conduct, actuations, and overreach of the current administration.” She argued that free speech “applies not only to those who are favorably received but also to those that offend, shock, or disturb.” She also denied that she was involved in an anti-government plot by asserting that the charges “are founded upon statements taken out of context, statements or interpretations unsupported by competent and admissible evidence.” About the accusation that she pocketed millions of pesos in confidential funds, Duterte pointed out that the impeachment complaint offered no proof that she appropriated the funds for her own benefit. She maintained that there is no final determination yet establishing malversation, plunder, graft, or any unlawful disbursement of public funds allotted to her office. Duterte said that the inclusion of documents allegedly showing her undeclared cash assets and transactions violates the confidentiality of bank deposits under the Bank Secrecy Law and is therefore inadmissible. She raised the same argument in rejecting the report of the Anti-Money Laundering Council about the financial activities of her spouse. The House prosecution panel commented that Duterte only discussed “purely technical issues” and failed to directly answer the allegations of offenses. They deemed it unnecessary to respond to Duterte’s “non-answer” because no counterevidence was presented. During the pre-trial meetings and amid the senate preparations for the trial, a “surprise protest” in Metro Manila demanded accountability and lambasted the “selective justice” targeting critics of the Marcos administration. This has a direct bearing on the impeachment because the protest was organized in support of a pro-Duterte senator charged with plunder. Duterte issued a statement expressing solidarity with the protesters. “The President’s failures of character and leadership have fostered an increasingly oppressive political environment,” she said, referring to the charges filed against her allies in the senate. This reiterates her earlier pronouncements describing the impeachment trial as an example of political persecution aimed at undermining her presidential candidacy. The first week of the trial will provide a glimpse of the actions to be undertaken by Duterte’s allies in the senate. They can either boycott the proceedings, delay the session, or even move to restrict the release of some evidence by raising privacy and procedural concerns. The trial will take place a few weeks before the president’s annual state of the nation address (SONA), which could become a platform for Duterte and her supporters to direct public attention to the unresolved corruption scandals hounding the Marcos administration. As the Duterte and Marcos camps trade barbs over who is more corrupt, the impeachment offers an opportunity for anti-corruption advocates to step up the clamor for truth, accountability, and justice. At a minimum, pro-impeachment groups are expected to demand a fair, transparent, and credible trial. They are also gearing up for another mobilization during the SONA to remind the public that the call for accountability applies to Marcos, Duterte, and their networks of political dynasties. Subscribe today and join thousands of diplomats, analysts, policy professionals and business readers who rely on The Diplomat for expert Asia-Pacific coverage. Get unlimited access to in-depth analysis you won't find anywhere else, from South China Sea tensions to ASEAN diplomacy to India-Pakistan relations. More than 5,000 articles a year. Already have an account? Log in. Sebastian Strangio is Southeast Asia editor at The Diplomat. Get briefed on the story of the week, and developing stories to watch across the Asia-Pacific.