Vietnam's Youth Face 'Triple No' Crisis Amidst Economic Disparity

A growing number of young Vietnamese are finding themselves in a 'triple no' situation—lacking family background, social connections, and stable employment—despite possessing academic qualifications. This phenomenon, termed the 'triple no' generation by Ho Quoc Tuan, a senior lecturer at the University of Bristol, highlights systemic disadvantages stemming from economic growth disparities. Many of these young individuals receive numerous rejection emails for job applications, indicating that their qualifications and efforts are insufficient in the current labor market. The lack of financial capital and social networks creates a double bind, limiting job opportunities and negatively impacting mental health. Unlike their more affluent peers who can afford to attend career networking events or pursue further education without financial pressure, disadvantaged youth are forced to prioritize immediate survival by taking any available job, often leading to fragmented career paths that fail to pass initial AI screenings. Furthermore, the existence of a 'hidden job market,' where positions are filled through internal referrals and personal connections rather than public postings, exacerbates the issue. This market is largely inaccessible to those from ordinary backgrounds, leaving them to compete in the highly saturated public job market. The psychological toll on these young people is significant. Repeated rejections can lead to disappointment, self-doubt, and feelings of isolation, especially when contrasted with peers' successes displayed on social media. This is not merely a matter of individual failure but a systemic issue where societal promises of rewarding effort are undermined by the unequal distribution of opportunities. While not unique to Vietnam, similar trends are observed globally. Research in the UK, for instance, points to a substantial number of young people not in education, employment, or training (NEET), with AI posing further threats to job security and mental well-being. Tuan argues that this situation represents a failure of the social system, which has failed to deliver on its promise of rewarding hard work. He emphasizes the need for social safety nets and transparent recruitment policies to prevent the loss of an entire generation's trust. He cites the UK government's recognition of the problem and its proposed solutions, including investment in mental health support and career counseling, noting the significant economic cost of inaction. Ultimately, Tuan posits that the cost of this youth crisis far exceeds the estimated economic losses. He stresses that supporting these young individuals is a shared responsibility of the preceding generation, not solely the government's, to ensure a more equitable future. Source: VnExpress