Sara Duterte's Impeachment Trial: Is the Public Still Watching?

The impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte appears to be following a discernible pattern, akin to seasons of a television series. The first season, focusing on Article IV concerning grave threats, spanned nine trial dates and concluded before the State of the Nation Address. The second season, which dealt with Article I regarding confidential funds, lasted for 14 trial dates before abruptly ending with a call for amici curiae. This week marks the commencement of the third season, which centers on allegations of unexplained wealth. The crucial question that arises is whether the public remains engaged. Is anyone still watching? In a recent episode of "In the Public Square," Rappler columnist John Nery was joined by Fifty5Blue Managing Director Bautista to deliberate on the level of public interest in the impeachment trial. This discussion sheds light on the critical themes of transparency, accountability, and public oversight in Philippine politics. Given the high office of the Vice President, impeachment trials are typically matters of significant public concern. However, as trials extend and new allegations surface, there's a potential for public interest to wane or for citizens to experience fatigue with political proceedings. With pressing issues such as escalating tensions with China in the South China Sea and domestic economic challenges, impeachment trials might be perceived as less urgent by the populace.