Sara Duterte impeachment trial: Week 7 highlights Gina Acosta's testimony
Politics

Sara Duterte impeachment trial: Week 7 highlights Gina Acosta's testimony

The seventh week of Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial centered on the testimony of former special disbursing officer Gina Acosta. Acosta testified that she withdrew P125 million in confidential funds from the Office of the Vice President, acting on Duterte's instructions, a key piece of evidence for the prosecution.

This article requires PRO

This article is outside the free access window or is a special report. PRO unlocks it and the full archive.

  • Sara, Leni gap narrows in hypothetical 2028 presidential poll – OCTA

    A recent OCTA Research poll shows the gap between Vice President Sara Duterte and former presidential candidate Leni Robredo has narrowed to seven points in a hypothetical 2028 presidential matchup. Duterte's support slightly decreased, Robredo's did not gain significantly, and the undecided bloc grew.

  • Philippines' 2032 Nuclear Power Goal Faces Potential Delays, NEA Expert Says

    The Philippines' ambition to generate nuclear power, particularly by 2032, faces potential delays, according to the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). An NEA official noted that while the country is well-positioned, the timeline may slip due to the complex nature of nuclear projects.

  • Law Professor Declines to Testify in Sara Duterte Impeachment Trial

    Law professor Dean Ralph Sarmiento has declined to testify as a witness for Vice President Sara Duterte's defense team in her impeachment trial, citing the need to preserve his independence and impartiality as a constitutional law expert. Duterte's defense team had listed Sarmiento as its first witness in unexplained wealth charges.

  • Sara impeachment foes in Congress get scraps in proposed 2027 budget

    A Rappler analysis of the proposed 2027 national budget reveals that congressmen who did not take a stand against the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte are poised to receive significantly smaller allocations for Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) projects compared to their pro-impeachment counterparts. Those who voted no or abstained are set to receive considerably less funding for their districts.