
NBI finds no relevant threats against Sara Duterte
The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) testified that it found no relevant information regarding threats to the life of Vice President Sara Duterte, presented as part of her defense in an impeachment trial.
MANILA, Philippines – The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) found no relevant information regarding threats against the life of Vice President Sara Duterte, an NBI official testified at her impeachment trial on Tuesday, July 14. “Noong triny namin i-check ‘yon, your honor, nakita lang naming relevant information as to the security ‘yong pagbabawas ng 75 personnel from the VPSPG (Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group) if I’m not mistaken,” NBI Bangsamoro chief Jeremy Lotoc said during the fifth day of the trial. (When we checked the security issue, your honor, the only relevant information that we discovered was the removal of 75 personnel from the VPSPG, if I’m not mistaken.) Lotoc was the former NBI cybercrime official who probed into the Vice President’s infamous Zoom press briefing where she allegedly threatened President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and his family. In 2024, the Philippine National Police removed 75 cops as Duterte’s security personnel, citing shortage of personnel for ground duties. “Other than those facts, wala kaming makitang relevant na security issue dahil ‘yon nga, hindi naman nag-appear ang Bise Presidente. Hindi naman sila nagbigay ng any information na puwede naming pagsimulan po,” Lotoc added. (Other than those facts, we did not discover any relevant security issue because as I said, the Vice President did not appear before the NBI. They did not also give relevant information that can help us for our leads.) The issue on Duterte’s security was in the spotlight because this is one of her defenses against the fourth article of impeachment — grave threats against the Marcos couple. The defense earlier claimed that grave threat is not an impeachable offense. They also argued that Duterte was pushed to the edge due to the so-called “Operation Romanov” or threats against her and family, and to her chief-of-staff Zuleika Lopez. During the trial however, Lotoc, in response to Senator-judge Raffy Tulfo, clarified that it was Davao City Mayor Baste Duterte who first referenced the Romanovs while criticizing President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. during a public event in January 2024. Sara Duterte threats vs Marcos justified, defense says. Are they really? The defense also floated the alleged bias of the NBI in the context of investigating alleged threats against high-ranking officials, noting that the bureau conducted a thorough probe into the threats against Marcos, but not so much in the case of the Vice President. However, Lotoc already said on Tuesday that the NBI conducted a motu proprio (on their own) investigation, too, for the Vice President, but found no concrete threat. “Again, since wala kaming validated information, wala kaming nakitang confirmed doon sa allegation at threats against her life, wala kaming napagsimulan (Again, since we did not find validated information, we did not confirm anything on the allegation and the threats against her life, we did not start any proceedings),” the NBI official said. Defense spokesperson Michael Poa told reporters on Tuesday that it’s importance to point out bias “because obviously bias affects everything that goes on in an investigation.” – Rappler.com
多角的分析
このニュースは直接的な経済的影響を示唆するものではないが、政治的不安定さや高官間の対立は、国内および外国からの投資家の信頼に間接的な影響を与える可能性がある。特に、弾劾裁判のような政治的リスクは、フィリピン経済の安定性に対する懸念を高める要因となりうる。
投資家にとって、このニュースは政治的リスクの評価に影響を与える可能性がある。副大統領が関与する弾劾裁判は、フィリピンの政治的安定性に対する不確実性をもたらし、特に外国からの直接投資(FDI)を検討している投資家にとっては、慎重な姿勢を促す要因となりうる。しかし、NBIが脅威を認めなかったことは、一定の安心材料となる可能性もある。
副大統領の安全保障を巡る議論は、国民の安全への懸念を浮き彫りにする。特に、公職に就く人物への脅威がどのように扱われるかは、法の執行と市民の安全に対する信頼に影響を与える。また、弾劾裁判という公の場での証言は、国民の政治プロセスへの関心を高める一方で、政治的分断を深める可能性もある。
市民の視点では、副大統領のような高官に対する脅威の有無が、自身の安全や治安に対する不安に直接つながるわけではない。しかし、政治的リーダーシップの安定性や、政治家間の対立が公の場で展開される様子は、日々の生活の質や将来への希望に間接的な影響を与える。特に、治安の悪化や政治的混乱は、経済活動や雇用機会にも影響を及ぼす可能性がある。
背景・歴史的文脈
フィリピンにおける副大統領の地位は、大統領とは独立しており、しばしば政権内での権力闘争の火種となる。特に、ドゥテルテ前大統領の娘であるサラ・ドゥテルテ副大統領と、現職のフェルディナンド・マルコス・ジュニア大統領との関係は、政治的な緊張の源泉となっている。2024年初頭から、両者の間には公然たる対立の兆候が見られ、それが今回の弾劾裁判における副大統領側の防御戦略に影響を与えたと考えられる。NBIが脅威の証拠を発見できなかったことは、副大統領側が主張する「ロマノフ作戦」という、政権による彼女とその家族への敵対行為の主張に疑問符を投げかけるものである。
原文ソース
Rappler Philippines