NBI chief to be last witness in VP Duterte threat issue; confidential funds next
Politics
2026年7月16日
4
Inquirer NewsInfo

NBI chief to be last witness in VP Duterte threat issue; confidential funds next

AI サマリー

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) chief will be the last witness in the impeachment trial against the Philippine Vice President concerning a "grave threat" issue, with the focus shifting to confidential fund transactions afterward.

MANILA, Philippines — The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) chief, Melvin Matibag, will be the last witness on July 21 as the House winds up its examination of the grave threat charge, which is part of the last of four articles of impeachment filed against Vice President Sara Duterte. According to its statement on Wednesday, the House prosecution panel has withdrawn the appearance of several other witnesses. “This withdrawal, Your Honor, renders Attorney Melvin Matibag, the NBI director, as our last witness for threat, who will be testifying this coming Tuesday, Your Honor,” Rep. Gerville Luistro, the House least prosecutor, said in her manifestation. READ: Impeach court to prosec, defense: No need to explain witnesses’ withdrawal The prosecution had earlier decided to forgo the testimonies of Duterte’s former chief of staff, Zuleika Lopez, and the House Legislative Security Bureau executive director, Capt. Belinda Bello. The prosecution announced the withdrawal after NBI Regional Director Jeremy Lotoc completed his testimony, allowing the panel to remove witnesses whose accounts would cover matters already established during the trial. “First of all, we would like to acknowledge the positive response of the Honorable Impeachment Court to our previous manifestation. Accordingly, we would like to reiterate that the prosecution will no longer be presenting Attorney Zuleika Lopez, as well as Captain Belinda Bello, reiterating, however, the same concern on redundancy, surplusage and lack of necessity,” Luistro explained. Luistro also withdrew a representative of the Philippine National Police Firearms and Explosives Office, journalists Mikhail Flores and Bonz Magsambol, Sheriff Abe Andres, a relative of one of the alleged threat victims, and a psychiatrist after reviewing the evidence already placed on record. “The witness intended to testify that the respondent owns firearms, including high-powered ones, which demonstrate the capacity and capability to execute a threat. On the other hand, Your Honor, it has already been shown that the government took the threat seriously, and, as a matter of fact, it prompted the full-scale investigation, including the recommendation to file a criminal complaint,” she noted of the proposed police witness. The prosecution likewise determined that the two journalists were no longer needed to confirm Duterte’s statements during the Nov. 23, 2024, video conference because an NBI agent had authenticated the recordings and the defense had subsequently acknowledged that the videos were genuine. “Agent Calilung already established that the video is authentic, plus considering, Your Honor, the defense’s subsequent admission that the same are authentic videos, Your Honor,” Luistro stressed. Article IV accuses Duterte of culpable violation of the Constitution and betrayal of public trust over her recorded statements concerning President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., first lady Liza Araneta-Marcos and former Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez, which prompted an NBI investigation and a recommendation to file criminal complaints for grave threats and inciting to sedition. With Matibag set to wrap up the prosecution’s threat case, the panel is preparing to begin its presentation on Article I on July 22 by seeking subpoenas for a House legislative archives official and two former LandBank branch managers connected to Duterte’s confidential fund transactions. “We would like to beg the kind indulgence of the Honorable Impeachment Court to note our next witnesses. This will be in support of Article I, confidential funds, and if we will be presenting Attorney Melvin Matibag on Tuesday, then this means that the first witness for confidential funds will be presented on July 22, that is Wednesday,” Luistro explained. “We are requesting that we be allowed to request the issuance of subpoenas for our first three witnesses for confidential funds, including Marivic Pareja of the Legislative Archives and Museum Management Service of the House of Representatives, and two LandBank employees, Violeta Constantino, former branch manager of the LandBank Shaw Boulevard branch, and Nenita Camposano, former branch manager of the LandBank DepEd branch,” Luistro added. /atm

多角的分析

経済的影響

弾劾裁判の進行は、副大統領の職務遂行能力への懸念を生じさせ、政治的不確実性を高める。これは、国内および海外からの投資家心理に影響を与え、特に経済政策の安定性や継続性に対する懸念から、短期的な資本流出や投資意欲の減退を招く可能性がある。また、機密資金の使途に関する審理は、公的資金の管理と透明性への関心を高め、今後の財政規律や監査制度への影響も考えられる。

投資家心理

弾劾裁判の長期化や、機密資金の使途に関する詳細な審理は、フィリピンの政治リスクを一段と高める要因となる。特に、外国からの直接投資(FDI)やポートフォリオ投資においては、政治的安定性が重視されるため、このような不確実性は投資家にとって警戒信号となる。機密資金の使途が具体的に明らかになるにつれ、政府の財政運営に対する信頼性が問われ、それが今後の証券市場や通貨の動向に影響を与える可能性がある。

社会的影響

弾劾裁判のプロセスは、国民の政治への関心を高める一方で、政治的分断を深める可能性もはらんでいる。特に、副大統領の言動や機密資金の使途に関する報道は、SNSなどを通じて広く拡散され、様々な意見が交わされる。これにより、一部の国民は政府への不信感を募らせる一方、支持層は副大統領への擁護を強めるという構図が生まれる。また、機密資金の使途が国民生活に直接影響を与えるものではないとしても、公的資金の透明性や説明責任が問われることで、行政への信頼に関わる問題として捉えられ、社会的な議論を呼ぶ。

市民の声

今回の弾劾裁判の焦点である「重大脅迫」や、それに続く機密資金の審理は、マニラ首都圏の市民の日常生活に直接的な変化をもたらすものではない。しかし、政治的な不確実性が高まることで、物価の変動や経済政策の停滞への不安を感じる市民もいるだろう。特に、若年層はSNSを通じて政治情勢を敏感に察知しており、将来への希望や海外就労への関心など、政治の安定性が自身のキャリアや生活設計に与える影響を注視していると考えられる。

背景・歴史的文脈

フィリピンにおける弾劾裁判は、過去にも大統領や最高裁判所長官に対して行われてきた。副大統領に対する弾劾は、大統領職位継承の観点からも極めて重要視される。サラ・ドゥテルテ副大統領は、現職大統領の娘であり、次期大統領候補としても有力視されているため、その政治的影響力は大きい。今回の「重大脅迫」疑惑は、副大統領の発言が公職者に対するものと見なされたことに端を発し、憲法違反や公衆への背信行為といった、政治的責任を問う根拠となっている。機密資金の審理は、政府の財政運営の透明性や説明責任を問うものであり、過去にも同様の議論がなされてきた。

原文ソース

Inquirer NewsInfo

原文を読む