Palace to Dutertes: Stop politicizing impeachment trial
Politics
2026年7月11日
5
Philstar Nation

Palace to Dutertes: Stop politicizing impeachment trial

AI サマリー

The Philippine Presidential Palace has urged Vice President Sara Duterte and her brother, Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, to respect constitutional procedures, pushing back against their accusations that the impeachment trial is politically motivated to prevent her presidential bid. A Palace spokesperson emphasized that the impeachment trial is a constitutionally mandated process and should not be politicized.

MANILA, Philippines — Palace press officer Claire Castro on Tuesday lashed out at Vice President Sara Duterte and her brother, Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, for their continued accusations that the administration is using the impeachment to prevent her presidential run in 2028. “If the Vice President can prove that she has not committed any impeachable offense, nothing can stop her from running and aspiring to become the country’s president in the next election,” Castro said. Castro was reacting to Mayor Duterte’s interview in The Hague where he claimed that those behind his sister’s impeachment want to remain in power. Castro urged the Duterte siblings to stop politicizing the impeachment trial. “The Senate is simply adhering to what the Constitution mandates – the process. That process ought to be respected, and the process itself should not be politicized,” the Palace official said. “It is her obligation as Vice President to answer the accusations against her... There is no politicking involved here, the impeachment trial is mandated by our Constitution,” she said. Castro also hit back at Baste Duterte over his accusations that the administration is “abusive” and is selectively prosecuting critics. “Under the administration of President Marcos Jr., power is being exercised correctly and in accordance with the law, unlike in the past,” Castro said. “Let us remember that punching a sheriff who is merely performing his duties constitutes a true abuse of power.” In June 2012, the Office of the Ombudsman reprimanded then Davao City mayor Sara Duterte for repeatedly punching a court sheriff who tried to implement a court order to demolish shanties. House Deputy Speaker Janette Garin denounced what she called the bullying and personal attacks against prosecutors that taint the public discourse on the ongoing impeachment trial against Vice President Duterte. She urged the public to focus on the evidence being presented instead of ridiculing prosecutors over their appearance. “I was surprised how we went to that low level of discourse,” Garin said, referring to social media posts of Duterte supporters that ridiculed lead prosecutor Batangas Rep. Gerville Luistro over visible saliva while delivering the prosecution’s opening statement. Also a target was prosecution counsel Amando Virgil Ligutan, who appeared to have a runny nose during the presentation of evidence. Garin, who served as a former health department chief, also rejected claims circulating online that saliva or colds are signs of dishonesty. “Never in the history of the medical community has colds or sipon been a cause of lying,” she said, adding that the attacks divert attention from the issues being tried before the Senate impeachment court. Describing the online ridicule as bullying, Garin said the prosecution panel was simply performing its constitutional duty. She urged the public to stop spreading misinformation and return the discussion to the merits of the impeachment case. For his part, House prosecutor Manila Rep. Joel Chua said appearing before the impeachment court is physically demanding, recalling that prosecutors were initially not allowed to bring drinking water into the session hall. — Daphne Galvez, Bella Cariaso

多角的分析

経済的影響

本件は直接的な経済的影響は限定的だが、政治的不安定さが増すことは、国内外からの投資意欲を減退させる可能性がある。特に、副大統領の政治的立場が不安定になることは、将来の経済政策の不確実性を高め、BPO産業や海外からの直接投資といったフィリピン経済の主要な柱に影響を与えかねない。

投資家心理

投資家にとっては、政治的リスクの増大は懸念材料となる。弾劾裁判の行方や、それに伴う政治的混乱は、市場のボラティリティを高める可能性がある。特に、次期大統領選を見据えた政治的な動きは、長期的な投資戦略を立てる上で不透明要因となる。

社会的影響

弾劾裁判の検察官に対する外見いじりは、公の議論の質の低下を示す。これは、SNS上での誹謗中傷がエスカレートし、本来議論すべき政策や証拠から国民の目をそらさせる現象として、フィリピン社会でしばしば見られる。特に、地方都市の市民からは、このような政治的対立が日常生活にどのような影響を与えるのか、不安の声も上がっている。

市民の声

市民の視点からは、副大統領とその兄が弾劾裁判を政治的な道具として利用していると非難していることが、国民の政治への信頼を損なう可能性がある。また、検察官に対する外見いじりは、公の場での議論が品位を欠き、建設的な対話からかけ離れていることを示唆している。これは、国民が政治的プロセスの公平性と透明性を求めていることの裏返しとも言える。

背景・歴史的文脈

フィリピンでは、過去にも政治家に対する弾劾手続きが度々行われてきた。2012年には、当時のホセ・デ・ベニート大統領が最高裁判所長官弾劾で辞任に追い込まれた。また、2018年には、マリア・ルルド・セルヒオ・レアル最高裁判所長官が弾劾手続きの過程で罷免された。これらの事例は、フィリピンにおける弾劾手続きが、政治的な権力闘争の道具として利用される側面があることを示唆している。今回の副大統領に対する弾劾の動きも、こうした歴史的文脈の中で理解する必要がある。

原文ソース

Philstar Nation

原文を読む