Sara Duterte impeachment trial: Pre-trial order outlines schedule, witnesses
Politics
2026年6月29日
4
Rappler Philippines

Sara Duterte impeachment trial: Pre-trial order outlines schedule, witnesses

AI サマリー

The pre-trial order for the impeachment trial of Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte has been released, setting the trial to begin on July 6. The witness lists have been finalized, though certain contentious points remain unresolved.

MANILA, Philippines – The pre-trial order for the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte has been released. Here is what the document, a copy of which was obtained by Rappler from two reliable sources, contains. Trial dates It is official: the trial will start on July 6 at 2 pm, and will run from Monday to Wednesday until July 27. Beginning July 28, the trial runs Tuesday to Thursday at 3 pm. The prosecution will have 62 trial dates, broken down as follows in chronological order: Presentation of impeachment article on apparent threats by Duterte to the life of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr: 11 trial dates Presentation of impeachment article on misuse of confidential funds: 31 trial dates Presentation of impeachment article on bribery: 8 trial dates Presentation of impeachment article on unexplained wealth: 12 trial dates “The above order of presentation shall be maintained unless modified by the prosecution through a manifestation and subject to the approval of the Impeachment Court,” the pre-trial order read, a copy of which was obtained by Rappler. Witnesses The Senate clerk of court adopted the list of witnesses of both the prosecution and the defense, without erasing any name. The prosecution has 57 witnesses, while the defense has 96. Common witnesses include: Dutete’s alleged bagman Ramil Madriaga House of Representatives Legislative Archives and Museum Management Service Director Marivic Pareja National Bureau of Investigation chief Melvin Matibag Caroline Moldez-Pitoy, questioned documents division chief of NBI Assistant National Statistician Marizza Grande State Auditor Gloria Camora Former Department of Budget and Management secretary Amenah Pangandaman Ombudsman Boying Remulla Anti-Money Laundering Council Executive Director Ronel Buenaventura Former senator Antonio Trillanes IV Securities and Exchange Commission director Gerardo del Rosario Former Department of Education undersecretary Gloria Jumamil-Mercado NBI cybercrime division investigation agent John Mark Calilung Senior NBI agent Jeremy Lotoc Representatives from Commission on Audit Representatives from the Land Transportation Office Representatives from the Civil Service Commission Other notable names on the prosecution’s list of witnesses has been retained, such as sheriff Abe Andres whom Duterte punched when she was mayor, to the infamous Mary Grace Piattos, a signatory in one of the Office of the Vice President’s (OVP) confidential fund receipts. “The examination of witnesses shall be conducted in open court, unless otherwise ordered by the Impeachment Court,” the order read. “The testimony of the witness shall be completed on the scheduled date of hearing allotted to said witness under the one-day examination of witness rule. The Court however has the discretion to extend the direct and/or cross-examination of witnesses for good cause shown,” it added. Marking of evidence The pre-trial order also indicated that the clerk of court can still schedule additional dates for the marking of evidence. Other matters The use of English and Filipino languages shall be used in the trial. The prosecution is directed to disclose by July 3 the names of its witnesses for July 6, in accordance with the rule to disclose witnesses three days prior to their presentation before the impeachment court. What pre-trial order didn’t say The pre-trial order, signed by impeachment court presiding officer and senator-judge Win Gatchalian, is silent on the following points that the prosecution and defense cannot agree on: how the Bureau of Internal Revenue box containing Duterte’s tax records will be opened whether private prosecutors will be allowed to examine witnesses – Rappler.com

多角的分析

経済的影響

副大統領の弾劾裁判は、フィリピン経済に直接的な影響を与える可能性は低いが、政治的不安定さが増すシナリオは投資家心理を冷え込ませ、国内消費や外国直接投資(FDI)に間接的な悪影響を及ぼす可能性がある。特に、機密資金の不正使用や説明不能な富といった疑惑は、政府の財政規律や透明性への懸念を高め、格付け機関の評価に影響を与えることも考えられる。

投資家心理

投資家にとっては、この裁判は短期的な不確実性要因となる。特に、裁判の長期化や政治的対立の激化は、市場のボラティリティを高める可能性がある。しかし、過去のフィリピンの政治的混乱と比較して、経済のファンダメンタルズが比較的堅調であれば、影響は限定的となる可能性もある。重要なのは、裁判の結果がどのように法制度やガバナンスに影響を与えるかである。

社会的影響

弾劾裁判は、副大統領という国の要職にある人物に対するものであり、国民の政治への関心を高める。特に、機密資金の使途や説明不能な富といった疑惑は、税金の使い方や公職者の倫理に対する国民の不信感に直結する。若年層はSNSを通じて情報収集や意見交換を行い、公職者の説明責任を強く求める傾向がある。裁判の過程で、国民は政府の透明性や説明責任の重要性を再認識する機会となるだろう。

市民の声

副大統領の弾劾裁判は、マニラ首都圏に住む市民の日常生活に直接的な影響を与えるものではないが、政治への関心を高める。特に、機密資金の使途や説明不能な富といった疑惑は、税金の使い方や公職者の倫理に対する市民の不信感に直結する。日々の生活費や交通渋滞に悩む市民にとって、政治的な混乱は経済への懸念を増幅させる可能性がある。

背景・歴史的文脈

フィリピンにおける弾劾裁判は、大統領、副大統領、最高裁判事、憲法審査会委員、監察官などの高官に対する罷免手続きであり、憲法で定められている。過去には、2012年に当時の最高裁判所長官レナト・コロナ氏が弾劾裁判で罷免された事例がある。今回の副大統領サラ・ドゥテルテ氏に対する弾劾は、政治的な対立や権力闘争の一環として位置づけられる側面もある。特に、前政権と現政権の間の緊張関係や、副大統領の政治的地位を巡る駆け引きが背景にあると考えられる。

原文ソース

Rappler Philippines

原文を読む