VP Sara Warns Marcos' China Remarks Pose National Security Threat
Politics

VP Sara Warns Marcos' China Remarks Pose National Security Threat

Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte has warned that President Marcos' remarks on China pose a threat to national security, suggesting a potential rift in foreign policy and the South China Sea situation.

Read up to 3 eligible full articles per Japan day (JST) for free

Create a free account to open up to 3 eligible full articles per Japan calendar day (JST). Headlines and summaries remain available across ASEAN 7.

  • NBI Probes Duterte Properties: P890,000 Asset Potentially Worth P60 Million

    The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) is probing properties linked to Vice President Sara Duterte and Davao City Rep. Paolo Duterte, where one asset declared at P890,000 may be worth P60 million. This development raises concerns about political corruption in the Philippines.

  • VP trial: Witness unfazed by confidentiality concerns

    Forensic financial analyst Atty. Alexander Cabrera, an expert witness for the prosecution in the trial involving Vice President Sara Duterte, stated Monday he has no fear or concern regarding potential confidentiality violations when examining her financial records. He asserted this during cross-examination by the defense counsel.

  • Defense Questions Cabrera's Qualifications in Assessing VP Sara's SALN

    During the impeachment trial of the Vice President in the Philippine House of Representatives, the defense team questioned the qualifications of forensic financial analyst Alexander Cabrera, a witness, regarding his assessment of VP Sara Duterte's Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net worth (SALN) violations, citing his lack of government service.

  • VP Duterte impeachment trial: Defense, prosecution clash over testimony

    The impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte saw a heated exchange between the defense and prosecution over the testimony of financial forensic analyst Alexander Cabrera. The defense called his testimony 'erroneous,' while the prosecution moved to strike the statement, asserting it was out of order.