
Cambodia's Tourism Sector Faces Downturn, Diversification and Enhanced Promotion Key to Recovery
Cambodia's tourism sector experienced a significant decline in 2025, with the downturn continuing into 2026. While cyber scam issues and border tensions with Thailand played a role, the core problem is over-reliance on Angkor Wat. The country needs to promote its diverse attractions and strengthen its promotional efforts.
Read The Diplomat, Know The Asia-Pacific The country can learn a lot from its neighbors about how to sell itself in a competitive international market. The sun sets over the seaside in Kep, Cambodia. 2025 was Cambodia’s hardest tourism year in a decade. International arrivals finished at 5.57 million, down almost 17 percent on the previous year, with a 43 percent fall in December. The slide has carried into 2026: arrivals for the first five months were down 47.8 percent year-on-year, and May, at 232,000, was the weakest month yet. The border conflict with Thailand prompted foreign travel advisories and cancellations across every market. A separate reputation problem, the country’s association with cyber-scam compounds, did real damage in Asian markets too. Prime Minister Hun Manet has pointed to safety fears as the main driver of the downturn and described the scam operations as a black economy undermining the country’s legitimate one. None of that is in dispute. What’s less understood is that the damage is concentrated where it matters least, and that the one part of Cambodia’s tourism that needs fixing is also the easiest to fix. Take the scam centers first, since they did the most reputational harm. In mid-2025, the government announced a crackdown on scam compounds, and in April of this year it passed a dedicated anti-scam law. The crackdown has not yet reached all known scam compounds, so the honest reading is that the job is not finished yet. But the direction has been set and the crackdown is being pursued publicly, which may help alleviate foreign visitors’ safety concerns. The border tensions, however, have not eased, and this is an issue largely beyond Cambodia’s lone control. The crossings have been shut for a year, and as recently as June, Prime Minister Hun Manet told Thailand there was no need to discuss reopening them. Yet the damage is lopsided. In the first five months of 2026, land arrivals to Cambodia fell 68 percent, while air arrivals, the visitors who fill hotels and restaurants, fell by just 20 percent. In other words, the traffic Cambodia lost is the traffic from which it earned the least. It is also worth noting that the headline land arrivals figure counts every border crossing, so a large share of the total is made up of traders, day-trippers, and members of the Cambodian diaspora rather than holidaymakers booking a week in a hotel. The real prize, high-value leisure travel, has been relatively untouched. For all the noise of the past year, Cambodia’s tourism has one structural weakness: its overdependence on Angkor Wat. The country needs to embrace the opportunity to tell the world of all the other reasons to come. The Cardamom Mountains contain one of the largest intact rainforests in Southeast Asia, with wildlife Thailand and Vietnam cannot match. Ratanakkiri has volcanic crater lakes and indigenous communities that barely register on the international radar. Phnom Penh’s food scene has in recent years become one of the region’s most interesting; the Financial Times ran a long feature on it this year, as Khmer cuisine began getting restaurant-level attention. The country’s coastal locations – Kampot, Kep, and the various islands – remain quiet, affordable and genuinely beautiful. Cambodia’s history also offers more than Angkor. The dark legacies of the Khmer Rouge period draw a thoughtful, engaged traveler who stays longer, spends more, and tells people at home. Cambodia has plenty of attractions but has so far struggled to let the world know about them. What the country needs is a properly resourced tourism board with a mandate to promote the country internationally. Thailand offers a good example. The Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) is slated to spend roughly $140 million on 22 strategic initiatives in 2026 alone, with public targets and a single coherent story, this year’s being “Healing is the New Luxury.” It seeks to steer visitors beyond popular sites like Bangkok and Phuket, toward Mekong cruises, themed trains, and a “Hidden Gem Cities” campaign that pushes people toward Sukhothai and Phetchaburi, so the country never becomes hostage to one or two destinations. The Cambodia Tourism Board, created in July 2024 to run promotions with private-sector involvement, isn’t standing still. In May 2026 it launched a “Visit Cambodia in the Green Season” campaign, aimed at stretching the tourist season past the usual November-to-March peak. In June 2026, it established a visa-free arrangement with China, which seeks to expand the single largest tourism market. The board has signed an MoU with Visa for anonymized spending data to target high-value travelers, and at ITB Berlin 2026 it represented the country with a bigger, more visible stand. What the board lacks is a proper budget. TAT’s international marketing runs to nine figures. The CTB’s promotional budget has never been made public. The missing ingredients are funding, a multi-year mandate, and the autonomy to run campaigns without waiting on the approval of the Ministry of Tourism. There are seven obvious moves that the Board could make to reverse the fortunes of Cambodia’s tourism sector. The first is to fix connectivity. Air arrivals in Phnom Penh were down more than 25 percent early in 2026, while Thailand and Vietnam aggressively courted low-cost carriers and opened new routes. A board with a proper budget could offer real incentives and help rebuild them. One initiative would be to underwrite a block of seats on a new route, then give them away as competition prizes. This would reduce the launch risk for the airline, while filling the plane with visitors who arrive ready to talk about Cambodia. The second would be to put the Mekong on the map. The lower Mekong, the Tonlé Sap, the Irrawaddy dolphins at Kratie, and the four-rivers confluence in Phnom Penh are assets that Thailand is already seeking to market its own version of. A river circuit of this kind would need no new infrastructure, only someone to package the boat operators, guesthouses, birdwatching guides and fishing communities into something a travel agent in London or Seoul can sell. Third, the government should own “dark tourism” properly. The Killing Fields and Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum draw hundreds of thousands of visitors each year, most of whom leave within an afternoon. A serious memory circuit linking Phnom Penh, and the provinces that are home to key Khmer Rouge memorial sites, tied to a reconciliation project and proper interpretation, would become a unique multi-day experience. The fourth is to make Phnom Penh a regional base for remote workers and “digital nomads.” Bali, Danang, and Chiang Mai own this market now, but are crowded and getting more expensive. Phnom Penh has fast internet, cheap rent, real coffee culture, and a creative international community. A proper long-stay visa, a handful of co-working partnerships and a small, targeted campaign would cost almost nothing and gener
多角的分析
カンボジアの観光業低迷は、サイバースキャム問題という「シャドーエコノミー」が正規経済に与える負の影響を浮き彫りにしている。これは、観光客の安全懸念を高めるだけでなく、国際的な信用失墜にもつながり、結果として外貨獲得の主要産業である観光業に打撃を与えている。タイとの国境紛争による陸路入国者の減少は、カンボジア経済にとって比較的収益性の低い層の移動が主であったため、空路入国者の減少ほど深刻な経済的損失ではない可能性もあるが、全体的な観光収入の減少は避けられない。観光庁の予算不足は、国際市場での競争力を維持するためのマーケティング投資の欠如を意味し、経済成長の足かせとなる。
カンボジアの観光セクターへの投資は、現時点ではリスクが高いと判断される。サイバースキャム問題の根絶の見通しが立たないこと、近隣諸国との地政学的な緊張が続くこと、そして観光庁のプロモーション能力が予算と権限の制約を受けていることが、投資回収の不確実性を高めている。しかし、アンコールワット以外の多様な観光資源(自然、文化、食、歴史)の潜在的な価値は高く、これらの開発と効果的なプロモーションが実現すれば、新たな投資機会が生まれる可能性がある。特に、デジタルノマドやリモートワーカー向けのインフラ整備は、新たな収益源となり得る。
サイバースキャム施設は、カンボジア国内の「ブラックエコノミー」を形成し、合法的な経済活動との摩擦を生んでいる。これは、一部の個人や組織に富を集中させる一方で、国家全体のイメージを損ない、真面目に働く市民や事業者の機会を奪う可能性がある。また、観光客の減少は、観光業に依存する地域経済や、ホテル、レストラン、土産物店などで働く人々の生活に直接的な影響を与えている。特に、地方の観光地では、この影響はより深刻になると考えられる。ダークツーリズムの推進は、歴史の記憶を風化させないという社会的な意義を持つ一方で、訪問者に対して深い理解と敬意を求めるため、慎重なアプローチが必要となる。
カンボジア市民、特に観光業に従事する人々は、サイバースキャム問題の長期化とタイとの国境紛争による観光客減少の直接的な影響を受けている。収入の減少は、日々の生活費の支払いや子供の教育費の確保を困難にしている。また、サイバースキャム施設が国内に存在することへの懸念や、国のイメージ悪化に対する複雑な感情を抱いている可能性がある。一方で、プノンペンの食文化の発展や、デジタルノマド誘致の試みは、新たな雇用機会や経済活性化の可能性を示唆しており、若年層を中心に期待が寄せられている。
背景・歴史的文脈
カンボジアの観光業は、長らくアンコールワットへの依存度が高かった。1990年代以降、内戦終結と国際社会の支援により観光が再開され、特に2000年代以降、インフラ整備とプロモーション活動の強化により、急速な成長を遂げた。しかし、その成長はアンコールワット周辺に集中し、他の地域の観光資源開発は遅れていた。近年、サイバースキャム施設の増加は、経済的機会の不均等や、一部の犯罪組織の台頭といった社会構造的な問題を反映している。また、タイとの国境問題は、過去にも断続的に発生しており、両国間の歴史的・領土的な課題が背景にある。
原文ソース
The Diplomat Cambodia