OVP's disallowance notice not final, says defense
Politics

OVP's disallowance notice not final, says defense

The defense team for the Office of the Vice President (OVP) asserts that the Commission on Audit's (COA) notice of disallowance regarding its confidential funds is not final, with a motion for reconsideration due by October. They also addressed fund transfers to the Department of Education, as hearings continue.

This article requires PRO

This article is outside the free access window or is a special report. PRO unlocks it and the full archive.

  • VP Duterte: NBI tried to 'forcibly' bring ex-Davao info officer to Manila

    Vice President Sara Duterte criticized the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) for allegedly attempting to 'forcibly' bring former Davao City information officer Jeffrey Tupas to Manila in exchange for money and promises, citing testimony from a former police officer.

  • Sara Duterte Asks NBI to Release Gracioso's Lie Detector Test Video

    Vice President Sara Duterte urged the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to release the video of dismissed policeman Rodulfo Gracioso Jr.'s lie detector test to quell doubts about its authenticity. She also expressed willingness to undergo a polygraph examination herself.

  • Government Urges SC: Junk Petition vs BSKE Postponement Law; Election Lawyer Counters

    Philippine government agencies urged the Supreme Court to dismiss a challenge to a law extending the term of barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan officials and postponing elections to 2028. Meanwhile, an election lawyer reiterated his plea for the SC to stop the postponement, arguing it infringes on voters' rights.

  • ICC Prosecutor Opposes Evidence Disclosure Cap in Duterte Case

    The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor has opposed a request by former president Rodrigo Duterte's lawyers to cap the disclosure of evidence in his crimes against humanity trial related to the "war on drugs." The prosecution argues that the disclosed materials are reasonable given the case's broad scope and the defendant's status as a former head of state, and are essential for fulfilling disclosure obligations.