Jokowi's Diploma Case: Witness Claims to Have Seen Original Certificate
In the defamation trial concerning President Joko Widodo's diploma, a plaintiff witness testified to having seen the original certificate. This testimony touched upon societal divisions regarding the president's educational background, indicating a new phase in the trial.
Read up to 3 eligible full articles per Japan day (JST) for free
Create a free account to open up to 3 eligible full articles per Japan calendar day (JST). Headlines and summaries remain available across ASEAN 7.
Related articles
- Sons of Religious Affairs Minister Resign Amid Public Scrutiny
Two sons of Indonesia's Minister of Religious Affairs have resigned from their expert roles within the ministry following public criticism over their appointments. While the minister explained their initial unpaid assistance, family ties became a point of contention.
- Asset Forfeiture Bill Criticized as 'Punishment Without Verdict' by Prominent Lawyer
Prominent Indonesian lawyer O.C. Kaligis has voiced concerns over the draft Asset Forfeiture Bill, citing legal inconsistencies and potential human rights violations. He specifically pointed out clauses allowing asset confiscation without a criminal conviction as being contrary to fundamental legal principles.
- Gibran's Diploma Lawsuit Plaintiff Testifies as Expert in Jokowi's Diploma Legalization Case
On October 28, 2026, in Indonesia, the plaintiff in a lawsuit concerning Gibran Rakabuming Raka's academic qualifications testified as an expert witness in a separate case challenging the legalization of President Joko Widodo's (Jokowi's) diploma. This development adds a new layer to the ongoing discourse surrounding the academic backgrounds of Indonesian political leaders.
- Jokowi's Diploma Case: Prosecutors to Present 120 Witnesses and Experts
In the trial of KRMT Roy Suryo Notodriprojo, accused of defamation regarding President Joko Widodo's (Jokowi) diploma, prosecutors announced their intention to present 120 witnesses and experts. The defendant had alleged the diploma was fake.