Philippines Faces Risk of Losing Investment-Grade Ratings Amid Corruption, Oil Shock
Economy
2026年6月30日
4
Philstar Business

Philippines Faces Risk of Losing Investment-Grade Ratings Amid Corruption, Oil Shock

AI サマリー

The Philippines faces the risk of losing its investment-grade sovereign credit ratings due to the twin threats of an oil shock and a prolonged flood-control corruption scandal, warned Monetary Board member Benjamin Diokno. Government infrastructure spending has significantly declined, raising concerns for economic growth.

The Philippines is facing the risk of losing its investment-grade sovereign credit ratings due to the twin threats of an oil shock and a prolonged corruption scandal in flood control projects, according to Monetary Board member Benjamin Diokno. Diokno, a former governor of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), stated in an interview with One News’ “Money Talks” that it is prudent to assume there is a risk and take appropriate actions. "We cannot be complacent and say they will continue to give us this rating, investment rating, because the rating agencies are reviewing our activities here," he said. This warning follows Fitch Ratings’ affirmation of the country’s BBB investment-grade rating but a revision of its outlook to negative, citing rising risks from global energy shocks and external pressures. However, BSP Governor Eli Remolona Jr. expressed confidence that the Philippines remains on track toward securing an A credit mark, asserting that the country’s fundamentals remain intact and the risks are largely external. Remolona also noted that a negative outlook does not automatically lead to a rating downgrade. The outlook revision had previously raised fears of the country receiving its first credit rating downgrade since 2005, when S&P cut the Philippines to below investment grade of BB- as fiscal conditions deteriorated. Diokno, who steered the central bank during the pandemic and saw about one-third of economies downgraded, took pride in the Philippines avoiding rating cuts. "That’s one of my major accomplishments as governor. We were never cut in our rating and that’s because I was very transparent," he stated. Concurrently, Diokno warned that corruption scandals in flood control projects could be more damaging than external shocks like an oil shock, as they would lead to a "loss of confidence," credibility, and a stoppage in infrastructure spending. Government infrastructure spending plunged by 45.6 percent to P189.3 billion during the January to April period from P347.6 billion a year earlier, as it has yet to fully recover from the flood control corruption issue from the previous year. "I wouldn’t be surprised if it will contract by more than that in the second quarter and so things are not moving. Things are not moving, so construction has stopped and that is a major part of our budget," Diokno elaborated. Meanwhile, S&P Global Ratings senior economist Vishrut Rana said the BSP is navigating a "tricky time" as it aims to tame inflation without growth trade-offs, amid weak demand conditions. "The central bank has to balance that to avoid worsening the growth situation. In our view, we think that modest further tightening is on the cards," Rana said in an interview with “Money Talks." Diokno had previously indicated he is "not ruling out further increases," possibly not only this year but also in 2027, following the central bank's second consecutive hike of its benchmark reverse repurchase rate by 25 basis points to 4.75 percent. Rana expects policy rates to end 2026 at five percent, higher than current levels, but cautioned that going beyond that could weigh heavily on domestic demand. Rana also flagged weak infrastructure spending, softer private consumption, and the energy shock as the main drivers behind S&P’s steep downgrade of Philippine growth to 4.1 percent this year from 5.8 percent, the sharpest cut in the region. "Combining these three factors, the private consumption, the public infrastructure spend, as well as the energy shock, are combining to give a relatively adverse year for the Philippines economy," Rana concluded.

多角的分析

経済的影響

フィリピン経済は、インフレ抑制と成長維持の板挟みという困難な状況に直面している。BSPは政策金利の引き上げを継続しており、これはインフレ圧力への対応として理解できるが、同時に国内需要を抑制し、成長を鈍化させるリスクを孕んでいる。S&Pがフィリピンの経済成長予測を大幅に下方修正したことは、このジレンマの深刻さを示唆している。特に、インフラ投資の低迷は、短期的な景気下押し圧力となるだけでなく、長期的な潜在成長力にも影響を与えかねない。政府は、汚職問題への対応と並行して、経済成長を刺激するための財政政策の有効性を高める必要がある。

投資家心理

フィリピンの投資適格格付け喪失リスクは、外国からの直接投資(FDI)やポートフォリオ投資に悪影響を与える可能性がある。格付けが引き下げられれば、フィリピン国債の利回りが上昇し、借入コストが増加するため、政府や企業の資金調達が困難になる。また、投資家心理が悪化し、リスク回避の動きが強まることも考えられる。特に、汚職問題によるインフラ投資の停滞は、経済の長期的な見通しに対する懸念を高め、投資家がより安定した市場へと資金を移す要因となりうる。日本企業にとっても、サプライチェーンの安定性や市場の不確実性増加といったリスク要因となりうる。

社会的影響

洪水対策プロジェクトを巡る汚職スキャンダルは、国民の政府に対する信頼を大きく損なっている。インフラ整備は、国民生活の向上に直結する重要な課題であり、その遅延や質の低下は、国民の不満を高める。特に、地方ではインフラの未整備が生活の質の低下に直結しており、汚職によって本来恩恵を受けるべき人々が不利益を被っている状況は、社会的な不平等を助長する。また、インフレや経済成長の鈍化は、特に低所得者層の生活を圧迫し、社会不安の温床となりうる。

市民の声

国民は、物価上昇と経済の不確実性という二重の苦しみに直面している。インフレは食料品や燃料などの生活必需品の価格を押し上げ、家計を圧迫している。一方で、汚職問題によるインフラ投資の停滞は、雇用機会の減少や将来への希望の喪失につながる可能性がある。特に、若年層は海外就労を求める傾向が強まっており、国内での安定した雇用機会の創出が喫緊の課題となっている。政府には、国民生活の安定と将来への希望をもたらすための、明確で実行力のある政策が求められている。

背景・歴史的文脈

フィリピンの格付けは、過去にも度々変動してきた。2005年にはS&Pが投資適格未満に引き下げたが、その後、経済改革や財政規律の改善により回復した。しかし、汚職問題はフィリピンが長年抱える構造的な課題であり、インフラ開発における不正は、投資の効率性を低下させ、国民の信頼を損ねる。近年、政府はインフラ投資を拡大する「ビルド、ビルド、ビルド」政策などを推進してきたが、その実行過程での汚職疑惑が、今回の格付け見通し悪化の要因の一つとなっている。また、世界的なインフレや地政学的なリスクの高まりも、フィリピン経済の脆弱性を露呈させる要因となっている。

原文ソース

Philstar Business

原文を読む