Myanmar is going through an interregnum, with the old system broken and a new one not yet emerged, says Thai scholar
Society
2026年6月29日
3
Mizzima (Burmese)
Relations
🇲🇲Myanmar🇹🇭Thailand

Myanmar is going through an interregnum, with the old system broken and a new one not yet emerged, says Thai scholar

AI サマリー

Myanmar is going through an "interregnum," a period where the legitimacy and cohesion of the existing political system have broken down, but a new, universally agreed-upon future political system has not yet emerged, according to Chayan Vaddhanaphuti, a scholar from Chiang Mai University in Thailand. In a discussion with Insight Myanmar Podcast, Chayan, a professor at Chiang Mai University (CMU) and director of the Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development (RCSD), said, "We believe that discussions are needed among people from various backgrounds." According to him, the current situation in Myanmar highlights not only political and humanitarian challenges but also ideological and academic ones. RCSD is a platform striving to discuss and formulate future political thought and socio-political frameworks for Myanmar. Chayan's main analysis is that Myanmar is in an interregnum. This is a period when the legitimacy and cohesion of the old political system have broken down, but a new system that can replace it has not yet been built with broad consensus. This is also a time of great ideological uncertainty. Basic questions such as "What is national identity? ", "How to build a federal system?

Myanmar is going through an "interregnum," a period where the legitimacy and cohesion of the existing political system have broken down, but a new, universally agreed-upon future political system has not yet emerged, according to Chayan Vaddhanaphuti, a scholar from Chiang Mai University in Thailand. In a discussion with Insight Myanmar Podcast, Chayan, a professor at Chiang Mai University (CMU) and director of the Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development (RCSD), said, "We believe that discussions are needed among people from various backgrounds." According to him, the current situation in Myanmar highlights not only political and humanitarian challenges but also ideological and academic ones. RCSD is a platform striving to discuss and formulate future political thought and socio-political frameworks for Myanmar. Chayan's main analysis is that Myanmar is in an interregnum. This is a period when the legitimacy and cohesion of the old political system have broken down, but a new system that can replace it has not yet been built with broad consensus. This is also a time of great ideological uncertainty. Basic questions such as "What is national identity?", "How to build a federal system?", and "What are the values that ethnic groups and all citizens can share?" remain unresolved, he said. This instability is both dangerous and an opportunity. If ideological and academic work can be carried out systematically, a more inclusive political framework may begin to emerge. However, if this is not done, ethnic and political divisions could deepen further, Chayan analyzed. RCSD's mandate is to critically examine social and environmental changes in the mainland Southeast Asian region. Within this regional framework, Myanmar has become a particularly important focus. This is because Myanmar has undergone significant changes over the past 20 years, and the difficulties have intensified, especially after the February 2021 military coup. RCSD had been working on Myanmar-related issues even before the military coup. It brought together journalists, activists, and researchers to study and discuss land, education, and social changes. These early efforts aimed to create spaces for collaboration, enabling those working within Myanmar to analyze their country's changes themselves. In previous years, RCSD collaborated with Mandalay University to help improve the research capacity of its faculty. It supported research on topics such as land grabbing issues in Upper Myanmar, the education of young girls entering monastic life in northern Myanmar, and tensions between tradition and modernity within agricultural communities. Furthermore, RCSD regularly organized conferences in Chiang Mai focusing on Myanmar. Even after the military coup, it launched a scholar-at-risk fellowship program in Thailand. Through this program, it supports journalists, artists, and researchers connected with civil society organizations. In essence, RCSD functions as a relatively safe academic platform for education and discussion during a period of significant security risks. Professor Chayan believes that such support is urgently needed. Many young people who have fled Myanmar after the military coup are trapped in an uncertain situation. Without legal documents, they cannot move freely within Thailand, and if they return to Myanmar, they risk arrest or torture. Some of these young people were participants in the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM). This movement involved government employees and professionals nationwide refusing to work under military rule. Chayan warns that these young people may face blocked opportunities to continue their education. In his view, this loss will not only affect Myanmar. Thailand is facing an aging population and is increasingly reliant on migrant labor in agriculture, services, and manufacturing. Therefore, a weakened Myanmar will have repercussions for the entire region, he said. According to Professor Chayan's analysis, supporting the education of Myanmar's youth is not merely an act of charity. It is a long-term regional investment, crucial for the stability and development of not only Myanmar's future but also Thailand and the Southeast Asian region. To listen to the podcast in English The Insight Myanmar Podcast can be accessed at the following link: https://insightmyanmar.org/complete-shows/2026/5/25/episode-543-through-the-interregnum

多角的分析

経済的影響

直接の経済ニュースではありませんが、治安と司法の信頼は地域経済の土台です。職場での暴力や未成年者保護への不安が強まると、夜間営業、観光、雇用、地域サービス業のリスク認識が高まります。

投資家心理

投資家目線では、個別事件よりも法執行の予見可能性が焦点です。加害者への対応が曖昧になれば、ローカルビジネスの統治リスクや従業員保護の弱さとして評価されやすくなります。

社会的影響

ミャンマーの現場では、環境を「個人間の事件」で片づけず、誰が守り、誰が説明するのかを可視化する圧力が強まります。軍の動きは、被害者側が孤立しやすい環境で、沈黙より手続きを選ぶための足場になります。

市民の声

市民にとっては、自分や家族が被害に遭った時に公正な手続きへアクセスできるのかが最大の関心です。地域団体が声を上げることで、事件の風化を防ぎ、被害者側の孤立を和らげる意味があります。

背景・歴史的文脈

このニュースは、ミャンマーの地域社会で法の支配と弱者保護がどこまで機能しているかを映す事案です。暴力事件そのものに加え、女性団体や市民社会が司法手続きを求めて声を上げている点が重要です。軍政下では警察・司法への信頼が揺らぎやすく、個別事件が地域の不安や統治への不信に直結します。

原文ソース

Mizzima (Burmese)

原文を読む