Thailand Faces Influx of Chinese EVs Post-Subsidy, Industry Calls for Protection
Economy
2026年7月13日
5
Bangkok Post
Relations
🇹🇭Thailand🇨🇳China🌐United Nations / ASEAN

Thailand Faces Influx of Chinese EVs Post-Subsidy, Industry Calls for Protection

AI サマリー

Thailand's automotive industry is raising concerns about the potential influx of Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) following the expiration of the EV3.5 incentive scheme next year, urging the government to implement stronger protective measures for domestic production and the supply chain.

Thailand's automotive industry is sounding the alarm over the looming end of the government's EV incentive scheme, known as EV3.5, next year. Industry leaders fear that once the scheme expires, the country will face a flood of Chinese electric vehicle (EV) imports that could destabilize local car production and the auto parts supply chain. The scheme provides tax cuts and subsidies to companies that invest in battery electric vehicle (BEV) assembly plants in Thailand. While the program has attracted investment and lifted domestic EV production, industry leaders caution that its expiration could leave Thailand vulnerable, as Chinese manufacturers may scale back production and turn to imports, taking advantage of zero tariffs granted under the Asean-China Free Trade Agreement. Suwat Supakandechakul, chairman of the Automotive Industry Club under the Federation of Thai Industries (FTI), said an influx of imported EVs could undercut Thailand's car production, forcing local manufacturers into a crisis. Auto parts makers would also bear the brunt, losing purchase orders as Chinese imports gain market share, he said. The growing concerns have prompted industry associations to call for additional protective measures. Earlier this year, the EV Association of Thailand and nine other associations urged the government to adopt stronger policies to safeguard domestic production. Among the proposals are requirements for factories to use more locally sourced BEV components, as well as adjustments to excise tax rates that would widen the gap between imported and locally made EVs. The goal is to encourage manufacturers to increase domestic production and reduce reliance on imports. Thailand previously reached a peak of nearly 2.4 million vehicles produced annually. Industry leaders nudged the government to aggressively introduce new measures to increase the use of locally made EV components. Mr Suwat said Chinese carmakers should be required to use more local content in their vehicles, which would protect the auto industry and help the country achieve its long-term goal of becoming a regional EV production hub. Under current rules, BEV manufacturers receiving Board of Investment incentives must ensure domestic EV parts account for at least 40% of total component costs. For plug-in hybrid EV manufacturers, the requirement rises to 45%. Industry leaders argue that without stronger enforcement of local content rules, Thailand risks losing its competitive edge. Mr Suwat also urged policymakers to reconsider the trade-in scheme, which was designed to increase domestic car sales by encouraging consumers to exchange old vehicles for new EVs or hybrids. However, a Finance Ministry source who requested anonymity said the trade-in scheme may be shelved due to unresolved issues, including determining the eligible age for old vehicles, assessing the value of used cars, and deciding how the old vehicles would be disposed of or exported. Chinese automakers insist they are committed to long-term investment in Thailand. Chris Wu, vice-president of Changan Auto Sales (Thailand), said the company views localisation not as a threat, but as an opportunity. "Changan respects the vital role that local automotive and auto parts associations play in safeguarding Thailand's industrial heritage," said Mr Wu. "We view these proposals not as a threat, but as a clear call to action for the transition towards genuine localisation." Changan has already transitioned from being a completely built-up importer to an active local manufacturer at its Rayong plant. The company pledged to increase local sourcing of EV component costs to 70% by 2027 and 80% by 2030, well above current requirements. Vehicles produced at its 10-billion-baht Rayong facility are already being exported to right-hand-drive markets such as the UK. He emphasised Changan is building a localised supply chain, not just assembling cars. The company is establishing a dedicated local battery manufacturing plant, which will allow it to source battery packs directly within Thailand, said Mr Wu. "We are here to stay, build and grow alongside the Thai economy," he said. Changan's commitment to Thailand is part of its global "Vast Ocean" strategy, which positions the country as its primary export hub outside China. The company is expanding production at its Rayong plant, targeting 200,000 units a year to support a sustainable product lineup. Mr Wu said the company's corporate philosophy remains anchored to its strategy of "Thailand, for Thailand". By absorbing Thai Tier 1 suppliers into its structure, Changan is strengthening local supply chains and ensuring its operations contribute directly to the Thai economy, he noted. Despite these assurances, Thai industry leaders remain cautious. The FTI set a 2026 production target of 1.5 million units, comprising 950,000 units for export and 550,000 units for the domestic market. However, Surapong Paisitpatanapong, advisor and spokesman for the FTI's Automotive Industry Club, warned that the export target may be missed due to geopolitical tensions, particularly conflicts in the Middle East. The domestic market also faces challenges. Pickups, once Thailand's product champion, have registered declining sales for years. Mr Suwat said the segment needs more government support to lift demand, which would also benefit the 1,500 auto parts makers under the FTI. "The pickup segment used to generate significant economic value, but sales have been weak for a long time," he said. "Without new measures, both manufacturers and suppliers will suffer." Source: Bangkok Post

多角的分析

経済的影響

EV補助金制度EV3.5の終了は、タイの自動車産業にとって重要な転換点となる。中国製EVの輸入増加は、国内自動車メーカーの生産量減少と部品サプライヤーへの発注減につながる可能性がある。これは、タイが長年培ってきた自動車産業の基盤を揺るがし、輸出競争力の低下を招くリスクをはらむ。特に、ASEAN・中国FTAによる無関税措置は、中国メーカーにとって有利に働き、タイ国内での現地生産へのインセンティブを低下させる可能性がある。補助金終了後の保護策が講じられなければ、タイは単なる組立拠点から、より付加価値の高い部品製造や研究開発へのシフトが遅れる懸念がある。

投資家心理

EV補助金終了は、タイ国内のEV組立工場への新規投資や既存投資の継続性に対する不確実性を高める。特に、現地調達率の引き上げ要求は、サプライヤーの選定や技術移転のプロセスに影響を与える可能性がある。一方で、長安汽車のような中国メーカーが現地生産とサプライチェーン構築に積極的な姿勢を示すことは、長期的な投資機会となりうる。しかし、保護主義的な政策が強化された場合、一部の海外投資家にとってはリスク要因となりうるため、政策の動向を注視する必要がある。

社会的影響

EV補助金終了後の輸入EV増加は、タイ国内の自動車産業従事者の雇用に直接的な影響を与える可能性がある。国内生産が縮小すれば、工場労働者や部品サプライヤーで働く人々の職が失われるリスクがある。また、国内メーカーの競争力低下は、タイが目指すEV生産ハブとしての国際的な地位にも影響を与え、若年層の技術者やエンジニアのキャリアパスにも変化をもたらす可能性がある。長安汽車のような企業の現地化への取り組みは、雇用創ちや技術移転の機会を提供する可能性があるが、その規模と持続性は今後の政策と企業の実行力にかかっている。

市民の声

EV補助金制度の終了は、消費者がEVを購入する際の経済的負担に影響を与える可能性がある。補助金がなくなれば、EVの価格が上昇し、一般市民にとって手の届きにくいものになるかもしれない。また、国内自動車産業の衰退は、タイ経済全体の停滞につながり、国民の雇用や所得に間接的な影響を与える。特に、ピックアップトラック市場の低迷は、地方経済や関連産業に依存する多くの人々の生活に影響を及ぼす可能性がある。市民は、手頃な価格で環境に優しい移動手段へのアクセスと、国内産業の雇用維持という二つの課題の間で、政府の政策決定に注目することになるだろう。

背景・歴史的文脈

タイは長年、東南アジアの自動車生産ハブとしての地位を確立してきた。特にピックアップトラックの生産・輸出で強みを持つ。近年、世界的なEVシフトの流れを受け、タイ政府はEV生産の誘致に力を入れてきた。2022年に開始されたEV3.5補助金制度は、EV組立工場の誘致と国内生産の促進を目的とし、一定の成果を上げてきた。しかし、中国メーカーの急速な台頭と、ASEAN・中国FTAによる優遇措置が、タイ国内産業の保護という本来の目的を脅かす可能性が出てきた。今回の業界団体の提言は、過去の保護主義的な政策経験と、現在の国際的なEV市場の力学を踏まえたものと言える。

原文ソース

Bangkok Post

原文を読む