Indonesian Legal Experts: Suspect Designation Valid Even Before Interrogation with Two Pieces of Evidence

Indonesian legal experts have asserted the legal validity of designating an individual as a suspect even before formal investigation or interrogation. According to this view, as long as two or more pieces of evidence exist, the suspect designation is considered legally valid, even if the suspect has not yet been directly questioned. This legal interpretation underscores the importance of evidence in Indonesia's criminal justice proceedings. Law enforcement agencies are expected to make careful decisions based on concrete evidence, rather than speculation, when identifying suspects. The criterion of having two or more pieces of evidence can serve as a safeguard against unwarranted accusations and human rights violations. However, it is important to note that this legal validity does not necessarily imply the suspect's guilt. It serves as a milestone in the investigation process, with the final judgment to be made after all evidence and legal procedures are completed. This expert opinion may influence future investigative methods of law enforcement agencies and discussions regarding the protection of suspects' rights.