Impeachment Court Senators Warn Defense Over AMLC Record Disclosure Tactics
Philippine impeachment court senators have voiced concerns over the defense panel's tactics, which they characterized as "veiled threats" against a witness and the media regarding the disclosure of Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) records. The senators criticized the defense's repeated emphasis on potential criminal liability for such disclosures.
Read up to 3 eligible full articles per Japan day (JST) for free
Create a free account to open up to 3 eligible full articles per Japan calendar day (JST). Headlines and summaries remain available across ASEAN 7.
Related articles
- VP Duterte: NBI tried to 'forcibly' bring ex-Davao info officer to Manila
Vice President Sara Duterte criticized the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) for allegedly attempting to 'forcibly' bring former Davao City information officer Jeffrey Tupas to Manila in exchange for money and promises, citing testimony from a former police officer.
- Sara Duterte Asks NBI to Release Gracioso's Lie Detector Test Video
Vice President Sara Duterte urged the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to release the video of dismissed policeman Rodulfo Gracioso Jr.'s lie detector test to quell doubts about its authenticity. She also expressed willingness to undergo a polygraph examination herself.
- Government Urges SC: Junk Petition vs BSKE Postponement Law; Election Lawyer Counters
Philippine government agencies urged the Supreme Court to dismiss a challenge to a law extending the term of barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan officials and postponing elections to 2028. Meanwhile, an election lawyer reiterated his plea for the SC to stop the postponement, arguing it infringes on voters' rights.
- ICC Prosecutor Opposes Evidence Disclosure Cap in Duterte Case
The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor has opposed a request by former president Rodrigo Duterte's lawyers to cap the disclosure of evidence in his crimes against humanity trial related to the "war on drugs." The prosecution argues that the disclosed materials are reasonable given the case's broad scope and the defendant's status as a former head of state, and are essential for fulfilling disclosure obligations.