Roy Suryo Questions Hearing Without Experts, Cites Unmet Compensation Demand

Former lawmaker Roy Suryo has expressed doubt regarding the absence of experts from the hearing presented by the Metro Police (Polda Metro) and the Ministry of Finance (Kemenkeu). According to Suryo, the compensation claim should have been accepted. This statement raises questions about the method of evidence presentation in hearings and how expert testimony should be handled. Hearings are crucial for establishing facts and making legal judgments, and expert knowledge is often considered essential for objective decision-making. The absence of experts can lead to concerns about the fairness and transparency of the proceedings. The specific nature of the "compensation claim" mentioned by Suryo and the reasons why it should have been accepted are not yet detailed. However, his statement suggests that hearings should not only be for taking testimony but also for addressing the rights and legitimate demands of the parties involved. Further information is needed regarding the detailed background of this matter and the reasons why the police and the Ministry of Finance did not present experts. Nevertheless, it is expected to prompt discussions on the role of experts in hearings and the handling of compensation claims. Information Source: Sindonews