NBI found Sara Duterte had intent, motive, capability for threats vs. Marcos, others — witness
Politics
2026年7月13日
5
GMA News Philippines

NBI found Sara Duterte had intent, motive, capability for threats vs. Marcos, others — witness

AI サマリー

The NBI has concluded that Vice President Sara Duterte possessed the intent, motive, and capability to carry out threats against the President, First Lady, and former House Speaker. Testimony indicated the VP instructed an individual to target them for retaliation if she were killed.

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) found that Vice President Sara Duterte had the intent, motive, and capability to carry out alleged threats against President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former Speaker Martin Romualdez, the Senate impeachment court was told on Monday. On the fourth day of the impeachment trial, NBI-BARMM Regional Director Jeremy Lotoc, who headed the bureau’s Cybercrime Division in 2024, testified further on the bureau's investigation of the Vice President's remarks in a Zoom press conference on November 23, 2024. “The NBI, in its analysis, established the intent, motive, and capability of the vice president to carry out the threats she mentioned,” Lotoc told the impeachment court. Lotoc added that investigators also conducted an open-source investigation to determine whether Duterte had made similar statements on previous occasions. He said they found an Oct. 18, 2024 Office of the Vice President press conference in which Duterte allegedly said she wanted to “cut his head” while referring to President Marcos. Lotoc also recalled Duterte’s statements during the Nov. 23, 2024 online press conference. “Huwag kang mag-alala, ma’am, sa security ko sapagkat may kinausap na akong tao. Ang sabi ko sa kaniya, ‘Pag pinatay ako, patayin mo si BBM, si Liza Marcos, si Martin Romualdez. No joke, no joke. Nagbilin na ako, ma’am. Ang sabi ko sa kaniya, ‘Pag namatay ako, huwag kang tumigil hangga’t ‘di mo sila mapapatay,’ and he said yes,” Lotoc quoted Duterte as saying. (Don’t worry, ma’am, about my security because I have already talked to someone. I told that person that if I am killed, kill BBM, Liza Marcos, and Martin Romualdez. No joke, no joke. I already instructed that person that if I die, don’t stop until you have killed them, and he said yes.) Lotoc further testified that several government agencies treated Duterte’s remarks as a serious threat. He said the Presidential Communications Office classified the statements as an “active threat,” while both the PCO and the Philippine National Police used the term “assassin” in their assessments. Before Lotoc took the witness stand, House private prosecutor Atty. Amando Virgil Ligutan outlined what the prosecution sought to establish through the NBI official’s testimony. “Dineklara ng bise presidente na siya ay kumontrata na ng isang tao para patayin ang Pangulo ng Republika ng Pilipinas, ang Unang Ginang, at ang dating Speaker ng House of Representatives,” Ligutan said. (The Vice President declared that she had contracted a person to kill the President of the Republic of the Philippines, the First Lady, and the former Speaker of the House of Representatives.) Ligutan also said the prosecution intended to show that the NBI concluded Duterte’s alleged threats were genuine. “Pangatlo, napag-alaman ng NBI na ang mga banta ng bise presidente ay seryoso at totoo,” he said. (Third, the NBI found that the Vice President’s threats were serious and real.) Lotoc testified that the NBI opened its investigation on Nov. 23, 2024—the same day Duterte made the controversial remarks during an online press conference streamed on former presidential spokesperson Harry Roque’s Facebook page. According to Lotoc, he instructed NBI Senior Agent John Mark Calilung to preserve the digital evidence, particularly the video of the online press conference. The bureau also identified the individuals present during the livestream and conducted an analysis of the statements made by Duterte. –NB, GMA News

多角的分析

経済的影響

このニュースは直接的な経済的影響を及ぼすものではないが、フィリピンの政治的安定性への懸念は、国内および海外からの投資意欲に間接的に影響を与える可能性がある。政治的混乱は、経済政策の不確実性を高め、ビジネス環境に悪影響を及ぼすリスクがある。過去の政治的緊張が高まった時期には、フィリピンペソの変動や証券市場の低迷が見られた事例もあり、同様の懸念が再燃する可能性も否定できない。

投資家心理

投資家にとって、このニュースはフィリピンの政治リスクを再評価するきっかけとなるだろう。副大統領と大統領の間の緊張関係は、政策決定の遅延や予期せぬ政策変更のリスクを高める。特に、外国直接投資(FDI)を検討している企業は、政治的安定性をより重視する傾向があるため、慎重な姿勢を取る可能性がある。過去の類似事例では、政治的混乱が経済成長の鈍化につながったケースがあり、投資家はこうしたリスクを考慮に入れる必要がある。

社会的影響

この件は、フィリピン国民の政治への信頼感に影響を与える可能性がある。高位の政治家間の深刻な対立は、市民に不安や不信感を与えかねない。特に、地方のコミュニティでは、政治的リーダーシップの混乱が、地域開発や公共サービスの提供に遅れを生じさせるのではないかという懸念が生じる可能性がある。また、SNS上での情報拡散も速く、市民間の議論や感情的な反応も活発化することが予想される。

市民の声

市民の視点からは、このニュースは政治的リーダーシップへの信頼を揺るがす可能性がある。副大統領と大統領の間の深刻な対立は、国民に政治的混乱への懸念を抱かせ、日常生活への影響を心配させる。特に、地方では、政治的安定性が地域経済や公共サービスに直結するため、このようなニュースは不安を増幅させる。過去の政治的対立が社会不安につながった事例もあり、市民は冷静な状況の推移を注視している。

背景・歴史的文脈

フィリピンでは、大統領と副大統領が異なる政党から選出されることがあり、両者の間にはしばしば緊張関係が生じやすい。今回の件は、現職大統領と副大統領(前大統領の娘)という関係性の中で、過去の政権交代や権力闘争の文脈も背景にあると考えられる。特に、2022年の大統領選挙では、マルコス氏とドゥテルテ氏の陣営が協力関係にあったが、その後の政治的力学の変化が、今回の告発につながった可能性が指摘されている。このような政治的対立は、フィリピンの民主主義における権力分立とチェック・アンド・バランスの機能、そして国民統合の課題を浮き彫りにする。

原文ソース

GMA News Philippines

原文を読む