NBTC's Internal Strife Stalls Digital Agendas, Analyst Urges Government Intervention
Technology
2026年7月8日
5
Bangkok Post

NBTC's Internal Strife Stalls Digital Agendas, Analyst Urges Government Intervention

AI サマリー

An analyst has warned that internal discord among commissioners at Thailand's National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) is stalling critical digital agendas. The expert urges the government to use its legal powers to restore the NBTC's functionality and support the nation's digital economy goals.

Calls for government legal intervention PUBLISHED : 8 Jul 2026 at 05:44 NEWSPAPER SECTION: Business WRITER: Komsan Tortermvasana The government should wield its legal power to rescue the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) from an alleged lack of unity among commissioners, which is stalling some critical national digital agendas, says a telecom and regulatory law analyst who requested anonymity. The analyst cited Section 74 of the NBTC Act, which states that the government has the power to ensure the regulator's management of national resources, including frequencies, remains consistent with cabinet policies. Moreover, the Digital Economy Act empowers the Office of the National Board of Digital Economy and Society, chaired by the prime minister, to summon the NBTC to receive direct policy instructions. "Despite its status as an independent regulator, the NBTC is legally bound to align its operations with state policy for the public interest," the source said. He said government intervention would ensure the regulator functions as a driver of the government's digital economy goals. The NBTC board unanimously approved in principle the draft of the third Digital TV master plan recently, which was awaiting consideration for two years. Currently, the NBTC board has been plagued by a lack of unity, characterised by a web of lawsuits involving commissioners, including the chairman Dr Sarana Boonbaichaiyapruck. This conflict has resulted in significant delays in broadcasting and telecommunications policy management over the past four years. Commission leadership has been treading water after Gen Anantaporn Kanjanarat, former chairman of the Senate Committee on Information Communication Technology and Telecommunications (ICT), testified to the NBTC selection committee against Dr Sarana's qualifications. On June 19, Gen Anantaporn and eight former members of the Senate ICT committee submitted a comprehensive fact-finding report about Dr Sarana's qualifications to the NBTC selection committee. According to this report, Dr Sarana allegedly lacks qualifications under Section 7 (b)(12) and Section 20 (4) of the law. These provisions prohibit any individual who has served as a director, executive or consultant for a broadcasting or telecom entity within one year prior to their selection as NBTC commissioner from holding a seat on the commission. A probe revealed that Ramathibodi Hospital at Mahidol University, where Dr Sarana previously held an executive post, holds an NBTC licence to operate the "Rama Channel" TV station. Other allegations involve articles 8 and 18 of the law. Article 8 states commissioners must not be state officials, employees of state agencies or state enterprises, nor directors or advisers of state enterprises or state agencies. Furthermore, the report alleged Dr Sarana violated Section 26, which mandates that commissioners serve on a full-time basis. Investigations determined after his appointment to the NBTC post, Dr Sarana allegedly maintains an active medical practice at state and private hospitals. However, there is documentation confirming Dr Sarana resigned from his academic and medical roles at Mahidol University prior to taking NBTC office. The analyst said any remaining disputes concerning Dr Sarana should be judged by the Administrative Court, rather than being used as a tool for political pressure. The analyst said the NBTC chairman's appointment underwent a rigorous vetting process by a Senate-appointed selection committee. If there were genuine flaws in the vetting process, the responsibility should also lie with the Senate. The analyst is concerned if Dr Sarana faces scrutiny for his qualifications, in the future someone might raise similar questions about the qualifications of commissioners AM Thanapant Raicharoen and Pirongrong Ramasoota. Prior to his current post, AM Thanapant was NBTC deputy secretary-general, and the NBTC has its own radio channel. Mrs Pirongrong was a lecturer at the Faculty of Communication Arts at Chulalongkorn University, which also has its own radio channel. As national interests are at stake, the analyst said the government should take a more hands-on approach. He said intervention is vital to fast-track essential projects such as artificial intelligence development, space economy development, the transition to 6G and the expansion of cloud and data centre schemes. He said the prime minister should announce in parliament additional government policies to solve NBTC problems by citing the NBTC's internal limitations and lack of cohesion as a risk to national progress, allowing the government to leverage related laws to impose a clear operational framework for the regulator. "Without such intervention, the NBTC risks becoming a bottleneck for the country's technological future," he said.

多角的分析

経済的影響

NBTCの内部対立によるデジタルアジェンダの遅延は、タイ経済の成長機会を損なう可能性がある。特に、AI開発、宇宙経済、6G移行、クラウド・データセンターといった先端技術分野への投資やインフラ整備が遅れることは、国際競争力の低下に直結する。これらの分野は、新たな産業創出や雇用拡大の源泉であり、その遅延は長期的な経済的損失を招きかねない。政府の迅速な介入は、これらの戦略的プロジェクトを加速させ、タイのデジタル経済の未来を確固たるものにするために不可欠である。

投資家心理

NBTCにおけるガバナンスの不確実性は、通信・メディアセクターへの投資リスクを高める要因となる。委員間の訴訟や資格を巡る争いは、規制の安定性に対する懸念を生じさせ、新規投資家を躊躇させる可能性がある。特に、将来のインフラ投資や技術開発に関わるプロジェクトは、明確で一貫した規制環境を必要とする。政府が介入し、NBTCの運営を安定化させることで、投資家心理は改善し、タイのデジタル経済への資本流入が促進されることが期待される。

社会的影響

NBTCの機能不全は、国民が享受できるデジタルサービスの質や速度に直接影響を与える。例えば、デジタルテレビのマスタープラン遅延は、より多様で質の高いコンテンツへのアクセスを制限する可能性がある。また、AIや6Gといった次世代技術の導入遅れは、国民生活の利便性向上や、教育・医療分野でのデジタル化の恩恵を遅らせることにつながる。さらに、委員間の訴訟は、公的機関の信頼性に対する国民の不信感を増幅させ、公共の課題解決に向けた社会全体の協調を阻害する恐れがある。

市民の声

NBTCの委員間対立とそれに伴う政策遅延は、タイ国民、特にデジタル技術の恩恵を享受したいと考える若年層やビジネス関係者にとって、直接的な影響をもたらしている。例えば、高速インターネットや新しい通信規格(6G)の導入が遅れることで、オンライン教育、リモートワーク、エンターテイメントなどの質や利用可能性が制限される。また、公共の利益のために設立された規制機関が、内部の対立や訴訟で機能不全に陥っている状況は、国民の政府や公的機関に対する信頼を揺るがす。市民としては、透明性のある意思決定プロセスと、国家の発展に資する迅速な政策実行を求めている。

背景・歴史的文脈

タイの国家放送通信委員会(NBTC)は、2011年に独立規制機関として設立され、通信・放送分野の周波数割り当て、ライセンス発行、紛争解決などを担ってきた。しかし、その独立性ゆえに、政府や政治勢力からの影響力を排除しつつ、公共の利益に資する政策を推進するという難題に直面してきた。過去にも、委員の任命や権限行使を巡る議論や訴訟は度々発生しており、組織内の結束力や意思決定プロセスに課題を抱えていることが指摘されてきた。特に、近年重要性を増すデジタル経済分野における政策決定の遅延は、タイの国家戦略実行能力に疑問符を投げかける事態となっている。

原文ソース

Bangkok Post

原文を読む