Retired Judge Who Returned Award Over Duterte Protest Dies at 79
Society
2026年7月12日
6
Rappler Philippines

Retired Judge Who Returned Award Over Duterte Protest Dies at 79

AI サマリー

Retired Judge Meinrado P. Paredes, a respected human rights lawyer in Cebu, has passed away at 79. He was known for returning the Golden Pillar of Law Award from the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) in protest after former President Rodrigo Duterte received the same recognition.

Retired Judge Meinrado P. Paredes, a respected human rights lawyer, died on Saturday, July 11, in Cebu City. He was 79. The cause was complications from interstitial lung disease and pneumonia. Paredes was the judge who returned the Golden Pillar of Law Award conferred to him by the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) after learning that former President Rodrigo Duterte received the same recognition. In a letter addressed to IBP national president Allan Panolong dated October 10, 2025, Judge Paredes said that while he was honored to receive the award, he decided to return the plaque as he “did not believe” that Duterte upheld the ideals of justice, integrity, and the rule of law. He said that Duterte’s regime was “characterized by the rule of the gun, not of law.” “This is not a protest but an expression of disappointment and disgust. I am doing this in solidarity with the victims and their relatives of human rights violations,” he said in his letter to the IBP, returning the award. Before joining the judiciary, Paredes earned a reputation as a courageous lawyer who stood for human rights and democratic principles during one of the most difficult periods in Philippine history. He suffered detention for a year during Martial Law because of his activism. He established the Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG) in Cebu in the mid-1970s and helped establish other FLAG chapters all over the Visayas. He defended political prisoners together with former senators Jose “Pepe” Diokno, founder of FLAG, Lorenzo “Ka Tanny” Tañada, and other legal luminaries who actively opposed the Marcos dictatorship. He was one of the lawyers who filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the disappearance of Fr. Rudy Romano, CSsR, and Levi Ybanez. The two were abducted by suspected military intelligence agents 41 years ago on July 11, 1985, coinciding with the death of Judge Paredes. He was also one of the lawyers of CERNET 27, a group of development workers who were accused by the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) of financing terrorist organizations. The case was dismissed with finality on July 10, one day before Judge Paredes passed, with the dismissal of the Motion for Reconsideration filed by state prosecutors. Judge Paredes, who hailed from Aurora, Zamboanga del Sur, never wavered in his conviction that the law must always serve as a shield for the powerless and a restraint against the abuse of power. Even after democracy was restored, he continued to speak publicly about the importance of remembering the lessons of Martial Law and safeguarding the constitutional rights of every Filipino. As a judge of the Regional Trial Court in Cebu City, including his service as Executive Judge, he became known for his integrity, independence, and dedication to the fair administration of justice. He refused to receive cash stipends and allowances from the Cebu Provincial Government and the Cebu City Government. After retiring from the bench, he continued teaching future generations of lawyers, sharing not only his extensive knowledge of remedial law and constitutional principles but also the ethical responsibilities that accompany the practice of law. Judge Paredes will be remembered not only for his service on the bench but also for his unwavering commitment to justice, human dignity, and the Constitution. In a speech he delivered in 2019 before the UP Cebu Political Science Society, Judge Paredes exhorted: “To the young generations who have not experienced the rule of the gun, my message is: Defend democracy and do not allow dictatorship to reign again.” Judge Paredes was married to Jane Carabuena, a former broadcast journalist and communications professional. They have two daughters.

多角的分析

経済的影響

パレデス元判事の死去自体に直接的な経済的影響はないが、彼がドゥテルテ政権下での人権侵害を批判し、法の支配を重んじた姿勢は、フィリピンの法治国家としての信頼性や、それに伴う国際的な投資環境に間接的な影響を与えうる。特に、法の支配や人権擁護が重視される分野への投資判断において、こうした判事の存在は一定の評価基準となりうる。

投資家心理

パレデス元判事の行動は、フィリピンにおける法の支配と人権擁護の重要性を改めて浮き彫りにした。これは、特にESG(環境・社会・ガバナンス)投資を重視する国際的な投資家にとって、フィリピンの投資環境を評価する上での重要な要素となりうる。彼の遺志は、フィリピンの司法の独立性と公正さへの期待を投資家に抱かせ、長期的な視点での投資判断に影響を与える可能性がある。

社会的影響

パレデス元判事の行動は、フィリピン社会における正義と法の支配への強い希求を象徴している。特に、ドゥテルテ政権下で懸念された人権侵害や法の軽視に対する批判的な声を、司法界の権威ある人物が代弁したことは、多くの市民、特に人権擁護活動家やその関係者にとって、希望の光となった。彼の死去は、フィリピンにおける民主主義と人権を守るための闘いの歴史における一つの節目であり、その精神は若い世代へと受け継がれていくことが期待される。

市民の声

パレデス元判事の賞の返還は、ドゥテルテ政権下での人権侵害や法の支配への懸念を抱いていた多くのフィリピン市民にとって、共感を呼ぶ行動だった。彼の死去は、特に法の下の平等や人権擁護を求める市民団体や活動家たちにとって、偉大な支援者を失ったことを意味する。彼の遺志を継ぎ、民主主義と法の支配を守るための運動が、市民の間でさらに活発化する可能性がある。

背景・歴史的文脈

メイナーラド・P・パレデス元判事の行動は、フィリピンの近現代史における権威主義と民主主義の闘いを背景としている。特に、フェルディナンド・マルコス元大統領による戒厳令下(1972-1981年)では、多くの人権侵害が発生し、パレデス氏自身もこの時期に拘留された経験を持つ。彼は、自由法務支援グループ(FLAG)の設立に関わり、政治犯の弁護に尽力した。その後、民主化を経て司法界に入ったが、ロドリゴ・ドゥテルテ元大統領の政権下で、再び人権侵害や法の支配への懸念が高まった。パレデス氏がドゥテルテ氏と同じ賞を拒否した行為は、過去のマルコス政権下での経験と、ドゥテルテ政権下での人権問題への強い懸念が結びついた、彼の信念に基づいた行動であったと言える。

原文ソース

Rappler Philippines

原文を読む