SC: Victim's withdrawal of complaint not enough to dismiss trafficking case

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that an affidavit of desistance, or a sworn statement withdrawing a complaint, from a victim of exploitation is considered “highly suspect” and cannot be used as a basis to dismiss a trafficking case. In a decision promulgated on February 19, 2026, and made public on Tuesday, the High Court clarified that even if a victim expresses their intention to withdraw their complaint, it does not automatically signify the end of the case. The SC pointed out that in serious crimes like human trafficking, victims may submit affidavits of desistance due to various factors, including pressure or threats from perpetrators, or economic hardship. Therefore, dismissing a case based solely on such a statement could facilitate the concealment of crimes and be detrimental to victim protection. This ruling is seen as a significant step towards strengthening anti-human trafficking measures in the Philippines, particularly in enhancing victim protection and support systems. The Philippines has long faced international scrutiny for being a hotbed of human trafficking, especially targeting women and children, prompting the government to enhance its countermeasures. With the increase in Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs), exploitation cases abroad continue to occur. The Supreme Court's decision signifies the judiciary's commitment to further protect victims' rights and ensure stricter penalties for perpetrators.