
Prosecution Seeks to Call Sara Duterte as Witness in Impeachment Trial
Prosecutors in the impeachment trial of Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte have sought to call her as a witness. The trial is set to tackle "Assassination Plot, Grave Threats and Inciting to Sedition." Duterte stated to the media, "In this bloodbath and bludgeoning, I will be bloodied but unbowed."
Prosecutors on Tuesday sought to call Vice President Sara Duterte as a witness in her impeachment trial. Private prosecutor lawyer Lorna Kapunan said Duterte's presence would be relevant to Tuesday's impeachment trial, which will tackle the "Assassination Plot, Grave Threats and Inciting to Sedition Against the President." "One of the key witnesses, albeit hostile, would be the Vice President. And therefore, if we can inquire if it is her intention to again appear in the premises of the Senate because we are already respectfully informing this honorable court that we will manifest that we will have a written request for her presence in connection with this article on grave threats, Your Honor," Kapunan told the impeachment court. Kapunan stated that media reports indicated that Duterte was in the Senate before her impeachment trial. In her brief appearance to the media inside the Senate premises, the Vice President said, "in this bloodbath and bludgeoning, I will be bloodied but unbowed." Duterte did not give a further statement nor answer any queries from the media. In response to Kapunan's manifestation, presiding officer Senator Francis Escudero said the respondent is not required to attend the impeachment trial and that a formal request must first be made for her attendance to be required. "The impeachment rules do not mandate nor require the respondent to attend any hearing or trial of the impeachment court, whether she was in the building earlier or arrived after. It is totally up to the respondent because, from our point of view, she is represented in this court through her counsel already," Escudero said. "Should the counsel for the prosecutors desire to call the respondent herself, the court will add on that motion request once it is made and/or filed, and need not make a ruling at this point time," he added. Escudero said he responded to Kapunan's manifestation to avoid the parties engaging in a debate before the presentation of the witnesses. On Tuesday's impeachment trial, the impeachment court is expected to discuss Article 4 of the Articles of Impeachment. To recall, during her expletive-laden online press conference in November 2024, Duterte said: "Pt** ina ninyong lahat—Martin Romualdez, Liza Marcos, Bongbong Marcos. Huwag kang mag-alala, Ma'am, sa security ko, kasi may kinausap na ako na tao. Sabi ko sa kanya, kapag pinatay ako, patayin mo si BBM, si Liza Araneta, at si Martin Romualdez. ("*Expletive* Don't worry about my security because I've already talked to someone. I told that person that if I am killed, kill BBM, Liza Araneta, and Martin Romualdez.) "No joke, no joke. Nagbilin na ako, Ma'am. 'Pag mamatay ako, sabi ko, huwag ka tumigil hanggang hindi mo mapatay sila." National Bureau of Investigation agents Jeremy Lotoc and John Mark Calilung and Captain Belinda Bello, Legislative Security Bureau executive director of the House of Representatives Office of the Sergeant-at-Arms, are expected to speak before the impeachment court on Tuesday. Calilung has taken the witness stand as of posting time. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte in May over allegations of culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, bribery, betrayal of public trust, and other high crimes. On May 18, the Senate convened as an impeachment court. On June 1, Duterte's camp filed their answer to the Articles of Impeachment, asking the court to junk the impeachment case against her. — VDV, GMA News
多角的分析
副大統領の弾劾裁判は、フィリピン経済における政治的リスクを高める要因となりうる。特に、政治的不安定性は国内外からの投資意欲を減退させ、為替レートや株式市場に悪影響を与える可能性がある。過去の政治危機時にも、同様の傾向が見られた。
投資家にとって、副大統領の弾劾裁判は不確実性を増大させる。政治的混乱は、法制度の安定性や将来の政策運営に対する懸念を引き起こし、特に外国直接投資(FDI)の決定に慎重な姿勢を促すだろう。現時点では、事態の推移を見守る動きが強まると予想される。
副大統領の弾劾裁判は、国民の政治への関心を高める一方、社会の分断を深める可能性もある。特に、ドゥテルテ氏の過去の発言は、支持者と反対派の間で感情的な対立を生みやすく、SNS上での情報拡散や議論が過熱する傾向がある。これは、公共の場での言論空間にも影響を与えかねない。
副大統領の弾劾裁判は、マニラ首都圏の市民にとって、政治的関心の高まりと同時に、生活への間接的な影響への懸念も生じさせる。政治的混乱が経済に波及すれば、物価上昇や雇用機会の減少につながる可能性があり、特に低所得者層の不安が増大する。SNSでの情報に触れる若年層は、政治への参加意識を高める一方で、情報過多による混乱も感じている。
背景・歴史的文脈
フィリピンでは、大統領や副大統領に対する弾劾訴追は、政治的対立の激しい手段として用いられてきた。過去にも、政治的ライバルや政権に批判的な人物が弾劾の対象となった事例がある。今回の副大統領弾劾は、現職大統領との関係性や、将来の権力構造を巡る駆け引きが背景にあると見られる。ドゥテルテ家と現政権との間の緊張関係も、この裁判の背景として指摘されている。
原文ソース
GMA News Philippines